Context-Aware Sensor Fusion for Energy-Efficient AV Perception

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in maintaining robust and accurate perception in dynamic environments without increasing computational demands, as existing sensor fusion methods often overlook contextual information and fail to adapt to changing conditions, leading to inefficiencies and reduced performance.

Innovation Solution

A context-aware sensor fusion approach that selectively fuses sensor data at varying depths in the model, using intelligent gating strategies to dynamically adjust fusion methodologies based on the current context, incorporating early, late, and intermediate combinations to enhance robustness and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If larger deep-learning algorithms and more sensors are incorporated to improve perception accuracy, then detection robustness is improved, but energy consumption and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperception accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic sensor fusion that adapts to changing driving contexts. The system switches between different fusion strategies (early fusion, late fusion, or no fusion) based on real-time environmental conditions, sensor reliability assessments, and contextual factors. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain high perception accuracy when needed while reducing computational load and energy consumption in favorable conditions or when sensor data is reliable standalone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If more sensors are fused to cover more driving contexts, then detection robustness is improved, but measurement precision may deteriorate due to noise accumulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection robustnessVSAvoidfusion result precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and leverages contextual information from the driving environment to guide sensor fusion decisions. By analyzing context such as weather conditions, lighting, road type, and scene semantics, the system determines which sensors are likely to provide reliable data and which may introduce noise. This contextual extraction enables selective fusion that maintains robustness across diverse driving contexts while avoiding precision degradation from fusing unreliable sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes fusion parameters based on context and sensor reliability assessments. When sensors are determined to be unreliable in current conditions, the system adjusts fusion weights or excludes them from fusion entirely. This parameter adaptation allows the system to maintain optimal measurement precision by preventing noise accumulation from degraded sensor inputs while preserving detection robustness through context-aware sensor selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If static fusion algorithms are used, then system complexity is reduced, but adaptability to dynamic driving contexts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm complexityVSAvoidcontext adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic sensor fusion that adapts to changing driving contexts. The system switches between different fusion strategies (early fusion, late fusion, or no fusion) based on real-time environmental conditions, sensor reliability assessments, and contextual factors. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain high perception accuracy when needed while reducing computational load and energy consumption in favorable conditions or when sensor data is reliable standalone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops that continuously monitor driving context, sensor performance, and detection outcomes. This feedback informs real-time adjustments to fusion strategy selection and parameter tuning. By leveraging feedback from contextual sensors and detection performance metrics, the system adapts its fusion approach dynamically without requiring overly complex algorithms, achieving context adaptability through iterative refinement rather than static complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12524996B2Context-aware selective sensor fusion method for multi-sensory computing systems
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
  • US12524996B2 patent drawing
  • US12524996B2 patent drawing
  • US12524996B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for identifying a current context and determining a sensor combination based on the current environment. The method may comprise accepting a plurality of sensor outputs and implementing a CNN to convert the sensor outputs into a plurality of features that can be used to identify the context through use of a gating algorithm that additionally determines which sensors have the most importance and which have little or no importance. The method may further comprise executing sensor fusion in a manner corresponding to the context. For example, the context determines whether early fusion or late fusion should be implemented and which sensor outputs should be included in the said fusion.