Intelligent Task Management System with Context-Aware Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional task management tools are outdated, unstructured, and incomplete, leading to mismanagement and irrelevance of tasks due to lack of temporal and contextual information, and they do not assist users in scheduling or prioritizing tasks effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for intelligent task management that generates intention objects based on activity attributes, including temporal and contextual data, to provide users with a ranked list of tasks and scheduling suggestions, using a client-server architecture and data exchange platform to facilitate task management across multiple devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional task management tools are used to manage tasks, then users can create and maintain task lists, but the tasks become outdated, unstructured, and irrelevant due to lack of temporal and contextual information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask relevanceVSAvoidtemporal and contextual information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically generating intention objects from calendar events, emails, and other data sources before users need to manually create tasks. This proactive approach ensures tasks are created with complete temporal and contextual information already embedded, preventing the loss of such information that occurs in traditional manual task management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring calendar data, email communications, and task completion status to dynamically update and refresh intention objects. This feedback loop ensures tasks remain relevant and current by automatically incorporating new temporal and contextual information, preventing tasks from becoming outdated

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If traditional task management tools allow users to schedule tasks, then tasks can be assigned due dates, but the tools do not assist users in determining when to schedule tasks or how to prioritize them

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling assistanceVSAvoidtime for determining schedule and priority
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system practices self-service by automatically analyzing user calendars, emails, and task histories to generate intelligent scheduling suggestions and priority rankings without requiring manual user input. The system serves itself by autonomously determining optimal task schedules and priorities based on extracted temporal and contextual patterns, eliminating the time users would otherwise spend making these decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting task priority levels and scheduling parameters based on analyzed contextual factors such as deadline proximity, resource availability, and task interdependencies. This automated parameter adjustment provides ease of operation by eliminating manual scheduling decisions while optimizing task execution based on real-time conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If task lists contain detailed information about each task, then tasks can be better managed, but the lists become unmanageably long and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask management qualityVSAvoidtask list structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies segmentation by dividing the task management system into modular intention objects, each representing a discrete task with its own set of attributes and associated data. This segmentation allows detailed information to be organized into manageable, independent units that can be individually processed and displayed, maintaining task management quality without creating an unmanageably long overall structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions to another dimension by organizing task information hierarchically with intention objects at one level and their associated attributes, sub-tasks, and related data at nested levels. This dimensional reorganization allows comprehensive task details to be structured in a multi-level hierarchy rather than a flat list, maintaining management quality while reducing apparent complexity through organized nesting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If traditional task management tools provide basic task listing, then users can track tasks, but the tools provide little assistance in actually undertaking or completing tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion rateVSAvoidtask execution support
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary intelligence layer that acts as a mediator between task definition and task completion. This intermediary automatically generates actionable intention objects from raw data, prioritizes tasks based on contextual analysis, and provides intelligent scheduling recommendations, thereby assisting users in actually undertaking and completing tasks rather than merely tracking them

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9348897B2Method and system for providing scheduling suggestions
Publication Date: 2016.05.24 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9348897B2 patent drawing
  • US9348897B2 patent drawing
  • US9348897B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, computer-readable storage medium storing at least one program, and computer-implemented method for providing scheduling suggestions to a user. A collection of intention objects is accessed. Each of the intention objects is a data structure comprising a plurality of activity attributes of an intention of a user to undertake an activity. Calendar data from a calendar of the user is accessed and an available time slot on the calendar is determined. In response to determining the available time slot, a suggested intention object is selected from the collection of intention objects based on a plurality of activity attributes of the suggested intention object. A scheduling suggestion is then presented to the user. The scheduling suggestion may include a suggestion to schedule an activity associated with the suggested intention object in the available time slot.