Context-Aware Asset Tracking via Dynamic Sensor Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wireless tracking devices report location data on a fixed schedule, regardless of user needs, leading to inefficient resource usage and reduced accuracy in supply chain monitoring.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of contextually aware monitoring systems using sensors, geofencing, and recursive algorithms to dynamically adjust tracking device behavior, enabling intelligent communication and resource allocation based on event type and location, with the use of Hidden Markov Models and Nested Geofence methods to optimize performance and reduce power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional wireless tracking devices report location data on a fixed schedule, then the system maintains simple operation and predictable power consumption, but the reporting accuracy and resource efficiency deteriorate because data is collected regardless of user needs or supply chain events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereporting accuracyVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts tracking device behavior based on supply chain context. Recursive algorithms continuously evaluate sensor data (location, velocity, heading, vibration, acceleration) and modify reporting frequency and performance parameters in real-time, transitioning from static fixed-schedule reporting to adaptive context-aware monitoring that responds to actual supply chain events and user needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where tracking data from sensors is analyzed by recursive algorithms that determine optimal reporting parameters. The system receives feedback about supply chain events, user needs, and environmental conditions, then adjusts tracking performance accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that continuously optimizes reporting accuracy based on actual conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If tracking devices operate at high performance continuously, then reporting accuracy and real-time visibility improve, but power consumption and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereporting accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts tracking device behavior based on supply chain context. Recursive algorithms continuously evaluate sensor data (location, velocity, heading, vibration, acceleration) and modify reporting frequency and performance parameters in real-time, transitioning from static fixed-schedule reporting to adaptive context-aware monitoring that responds to actual supply chain events and user needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (reporting frequency, sensor sampling rates, transmission power) based on detected supply chain context. When events such as geofence violations, unusual vibration patterns, or critical supply chain milestones are detected, the system increases reporting frequency and performance; during normal conditions, it reduces parameters to conserve power and reduce costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If tracking devices report all location data continuously, then complete supply chain visibility is achieved, but data transmission costs and network resource usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupply chain visibilityVSAvoidtransmission cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and reports only the most relevant supply chain information based on contextual analysis. Recursive algorithms identify significant events (geofence violations, temperature excursions, unexpected stops, delivery milestones) and prioritize transmission of this critical data while filtering out redundant routine location updates, thereby reducing unnecessary data transmission costs while maintaining complete visibility of important supply chain events

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (reporting frequency, sensor sampling rates, transmission power) based on detected supply chain context. When events such as geofence violations, unusual vibration patterns, or critical supply chain milestones are detected, the system increases reporting frequency and performance; during normal conditions, it reduces parameters to conserve power and reduce costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Use of energy by moving object

If tracking devices use dynamic performance adjustment, then power consumption and costs are optimized, but system complexity and algorithm requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses universal recursive algorithms that can process multiple sensor types (GPS location, accelerometer, gyroscope, temperature sensors) and various supply chain event types through a single unified framework. This multi-functional approach allows the same core algorithmic structure to handle diverse tracking scenarios, reducing the need for separate specialized systems while achieving dynamic optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The tracking device autonomously determines when and what to report using onboard recursive algorithms that analyze sensor data and make decisions about reporting frequency and content. The system self-adjusts its behavior based on detected supply chain events without requiring constant external control or complex centralized management, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining intelligent dynamic optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9177282B2Contextually aware monitoring of assets
Publication Date: 2015.11.03 SAVI TECH INC
  • US9177282B2 patent drawing
  • US9177282B2 patent drawing
  • US9177282B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus, method and system for contextually aware monitoring of a supply chain are disclosed. In some implementations, contextually aware monitoring can include monitoring of the supply chain tradelane with tracking devices including sensors for determining location, velocity, heading, vibration, acceleration (e.g., 3D acceleration), or any other sensor that can monitor the environment of the shipping container to provide contextual awareness. The contextual awareness can be enabled by geofencing and recursive algorithms, which allow dynamic modification of the tracking device behavior. Dynamic modification can reduce performance to save power (e.g., save battery usage) and lower costs. Dynamic modification can increase performance where it matters in the supply chain for improved reporting accuracy or frequency or recognition of supply chain events. Dynamic modification can adapt performance such as wireless communications to the region or location of the tracking device.