Context-Aware Vulnerability Prioritization for Device-Specific Risk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vulnerability prioritization methods rely solely on CVSS scores, which are not specific to a device's context, leading to inefficient resource allocation and costly, time-consuming patching efforts due to overlooking device-specific mitigating or preventing factors.

Innovation Solution

Analyze a device's execution environment to identify contextual factors that prevent, mitigate, or increase vulnerability risks, adjusting CVSS scores based on these factors to generate a device-specific list of vulnerabilities prioritized by their actual impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If vulnerability prioritization is based solely on CVSS scores, then the prioritization process is simple and fast, but the accuracy and device-specific relevance of the prioritization is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability impact assessment accuracyVSAvoidprioritization process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vulnerability assessment process is segmented into multiple independent analysis components: CVSS score analysis, contextual factor identification, exploitation condition evaluation, and prioritization scoring. Each component handles a specific aspect of the assessment, improving accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through modular processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds new dimensions to the traditional CVSS-based prioritization by incorporating contextual factors (software version, configuration settings, enabled services) and exploitation conditions as additional assessment criteria. This multi-dimensional approach transforms the single-dimension CVSS scoring into a comprehensive device-specific vulnerability assessment framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If all vulnerabilities are fixed based on CVSS scores, then comprehensive security coverage is achieved, but resource consumption and patching time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverage completenessVSAvoidpatching efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of fixing all vulnerabilities uniformly, the patent applies partial action by identifying and prioritizing only those vulnerabilities that meet specific exploitation conditions and contextual factors. Resources are focused on addressing the most critical device-specific vulnerabilities rather than all potential vulnerabilities, improving patching efficiency while maintaining adequate security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the prioritization parameters from static CVSS scores alone to dynamic device-specific parameters including contextual factors and exploitation conditions. This parameter transformation enables more accurate identification of vulnerabilities that actually affect the specific device configuration, reducing unnecessary patching efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If device-specific contextual analysis is performed, then vulnerability prioritization accuracy improves, but the analysis time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability relevance assessmentVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-identifying and cataloging contextual factors (software versions, configuration settings, enabled services) before vulnerability assessment. This preliminary contextualization enables faster matching of vulnerabilities to device-specific conditions during the actual assessment, reducing analysis time while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12561442B2Prioritizing vulnerabilities
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 JFROG LTD
  • US12561442B2 patent drawing
  • US12561442B2 patent drawing
  • US12561442B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system and product are provided including obtaining a list of vulnerabilities of an execution environment of a device, analyzing the execution environment to determine contextual factors of the execution environment, and adjusting the list of vulnerabilities based on the contextual factors. This provides a device-specific list of vulnerabilities configured to indicate an estimated impact of each listed vulnerability. Adjusting the list includes at least one of removing a first vulnerability from the list in case that exploitation of the first vulnerability is prevented in the device by the contextual factors, decreasing a score of a second vulnerability of the list in case the contextual factors mitigate an exploitation of the second vulnerability, and increasing a score of a third vulnerability of the list in case that the contextual factors increase a risk of an exploitation of the third vulnerability.