Context-Based Annotation Fading in Touch Display Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electronic whiteboards require users to manually delete or undo previous annotations to make new ones, which can be awkward and disruptive, especially when highlighting multiple unrelated points during a presentation, and often suffer from false detection of gestures due to accidental wrist or knuckle contact.

Innovation Solution

A presentation system that automatically fades out previous annotations based on factors like time, stroke length, and grouping, allowing new annotations to be made without manual deletion, and incorporates intelligent gesture detection to ignore extraneous contacts and distinguish between intended gestures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual deletion or undo is required for previous annotations, then annotation control precision is improved, but operation complexity and disruption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation control precisionVSAvoidoperation smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically deletes annotations based on predetermined criteria (time elapsed, stroke characteristics, grouping patterns) without requiring user intervention. This preliminary automated action resolves the contradiction by maintaining annotation control precision through systematic rules while eliminating the operational disruption of manual deletion or undo commands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The annotation management system serves itself by automatically determining which annotations to delete based on their own characteristics (stroke length, time stamp, spatial grouping) and system state. This self-service mechanism improves ease of operation by removing manual intervention while maintaining precision through algorithmic analysis of annotation properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If gesture detection is sensitive to all contacts, then detection accuracy is improved, but false detection from accidental contact increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse detection from accidental contact
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different detection criteria to different contact scenarios by analyzing local characteristics of each contact (pressure, duration, spatial relationship, motion pattern). This allows the system to distinguish between intentional gestures and accidental wrist/knuckle contacts while maintaining high sensitivity for valid gestures, resolving the contradiction between detection accuracy and false positive reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The gesture detection system uses feedback from multiple sensors (pressure, position, motion) to continuously refine its classification of contacts. By analyzing the pattern and context of each contact in real-time, the system can adjust its detection threshold dynamically, maintaining high accuracy for intentional gestures while filtering out accidental contacts that exhibit different characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Duration of action of stationary object

If annotations remain visible longer, then information retention is improved, but visual clutter and distraction increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation visibility durationVSAvoidvisual clutter and distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic evaluation of annotation visibility based on time elapsed, user interaction patterns, and presentation context. Annotations are automatically deleted after predetermined time intervals or when specific conditions are met, creating a rhythmic pattern of appearance and disappearance that maintains information retention while preventing prolonged visual clutter

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The annotation visibility duration is made dynamic rather than static, adjusting based on multiple factors including annotation importance, user engagement, and presentation flow. This dynamic approach allows important annotations to remain visible longer while automatically removing less critical ones, balancing information retention with visual clarity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11513678B2Context based annotating in an electronic presentation system
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US11513678B2 patent drawing
  • US11513678B2 patent drawing
  • US11513678B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A presentation system capable of detecting one or more gestures and contacts on a touch sensitive display. The presentation system can displaying indicia of such contacts, such as when a user writes with a fingertip, and can remove or alter such indicia responsive to other gestures and contacts. The system can accurately distinguish between types of gestures detected, such as between a writing gesture and an erasing gesture, on both large and small touch sensitive displays, thereby obviating the need for a user to make additional selective inputs to transition from one type of gesture to another. The system can determine how long to keep user annotations displayed during a presentation, based on the nature of the gesture used to make the annotations and the context in which they are made.