Context-Based Operator Assistance for Control Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Control systems face challenges in retaining operator experience due to employee turnover and the need for assistance in complex or urgent situations, particularly for inexperienced operators who may struggle with compliance and decision-making under irregular or high-stress conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that record operator best practices based on experienced operators' actions and provide context-based guidance to inexperienced operators by assessing control system and operator states, using predefined rules to determine complexity and trigger appropriate assistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If standard operating procedures are provided to all operators, then compliance should improve, but inexperienced operators still perform worse than experienced operators in complex or urgent situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator compliance with SOPsVSAvoidoperator performance in complex situations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides differentiated guidance based on operator expertise level and situation complexity. Inexperienced operators receive more detailed step-by-step guidance for complex situations, while experienced operators receive streamlined alerts. The guidance content adapts locally to the specific operator's needs rather than applying uniform procedures to all.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

An intelligent software intermediary analyzes the control system state, operator profile, and situation complexity to dynamically generate appropriate guidance. This intermediary translates standard operating procedures into context-specific recommendations tailored to the operator's experience level and the current situation's complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If experienced operators are relied upon for complex operations, then performance improves, but employee turnover and retirement cause loss of valuable experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator performance in complex operationsVSAvoidloss of operator experience
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures and stores guidance patterns from experienced operators' responses to various control situations. This creates a digital repository of expert knowledge that can be copied and applied to future similar situations, preserving experience even when experienced operators leave the organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously learns from operator interactions with the guidance system. When experienced operators correct or refine system recommendations, this feedback is used to improve future guidance generation, progressively enhancing the system's embodied knowledge base.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If guidance is provided to inexperienced operators in all situations, then compliance improves, but system complexity and information overload increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator complianceVSAvoidguidance system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial guidance only when and where needed - specifically for inexperienced operators in complex or urgent situations. Rather than providing comprehensive guidance in all circumstances, it selectively activates assistance based on assessed need, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining compliance where critical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The guidance system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on real-time assessment of operator expertise and situation complexity. The level and type of guidance provided changes dynamically rather than remaining static, allowing the system to simplify its output when full guidance is unnecessary while providing detailed assistance when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If monitoring of operator compliance is implemented, then performance can be tracked, but the complexity of monitoring and analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator compliance monitoringVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-assessment by automatically analyzing control system state changes to determine when guidance is needed. Rather than requiring complex external monitoring of operator inputs, the system monitors objective system state changes that indicate compliance issues, simplifying the monitoring architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3270243B1Methods and systems for context based operator assistance for control systems
Publication Date: 2019.10.23 YOKOGAWA ELECTRIC CORP
  • EP3270243B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3270243B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3270243B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention comprises methods, systems and computer programs for providing context based assistance to a control system operator. The invention comprises (i) detecting a first instance of a control system event, (ii) determining event complexity corresponding to the first instance of the control system event, and (iii) responsive to event complexity exceeding a predefined complexity threshold: (a) retrieving a set of operator inputs received at a control system in response to a detected second instance of the control system event, wherein the second instance of the control system event was detected prior in time to the detected first instance of the control system event, and (b) communicating to the control system operator, information identifying a set of operator inputs for responding to the detected first instance of the control event, wherein the identified operator inputs are a sub-set of the retrieved set of operator inputs.