Context Disambiguation Using Topic Embeddings and N-Sphere Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing retrieval systems struggle to handle ambiguous user inputs by providing a diverse selection of relevant documents while maintaining semantic and syntax relevancy, often resulting in less relevant or conflicting responses due to reliance on distance metrics.

Innovation Solution

The Ambiguous-Agnostic Context Disambiguation (AACD) system uses high-dimensional vector spaces and embeddings to identify relevant document fragments by prioritizing semantic and syntax relevancy, constructing n-spheres to retrieve documents within a search radius, ensuring both breadth and relevance in responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If distance metrics (cosine distance or Euclidean distance) are used to compare embeddings between user input and documents, then retrieval speed and simplicity are improved, but the ability to handle ambiguous user inputs and provide diverse relevant documents deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretrieval speedVSAvoidability to handle ambiguous inputs
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the retrieval process into multiple stages: first identifying candidate documents using distance metrics, then applying re-ranking with advanced similarity measures (cosine similarity, Jaccard similarity, Levenshtein distance) to handle ambiguity. This multi-stage approach maintains speed while improving adaptability to ambiguous inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters used for document evaluation from simple distance metrics to multiple similarity parameters including cosine similarity, Jaccard similarity, and Levenshtein distance. By adjusting and combining these parameters, the system can adapt to ambiguous user inputs while maintaining retrieval efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If retrieval systems prioritize depth (accuracy of documents relating to user input), then response precision is improved, but the ability to provide diverse document selections deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse precisionVSAvoiddocument diversity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic retrieval system that adjusts between depth and breadth based on input characteristics. For ambiguous inputs, the system dynamically expands the search to include diverse documents with moderate similarity scores, while for clear inputs, it focuses on high-precision matches. This dynamic adjustment is achieved through the re-ranking mechanism that combines multiple similarity measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent retrieves more documents than traditionally necessary (excessive action) and then applies re-ranking to select the most relevant ones. By initially retrieving a broader set of documents including those with moderate similarity scores, the system ensures diversity is not lost, then uses multi-parameter evaluation to identify the precise matches needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple similarity measures (cosine similarity, Jaccard similarity, Levenshtein distance) are combined for re-ranking, then handling of ambiguous inputs is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling of ambiguous inputsVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the computational process into two phases: a fast initial retrieval phase using simple distance metrics, and a more computationally intensive re-ranking phase that applies multiple similarity measures only to candidate documents. This segmentation reduces overall computational complexity while maintaining the ability to handle ambiguous inputs effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary filtering using distance metrics before applying the more computationally expensive similarity measures. By pre-identifying candidate documents that meet basic criteria, the system reduces the number of documents that require intensive multi-measure evaluation, thereby lowering overall computational complexity while preserving adaptability to ambiguous inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12579200B1Ambiguous-agnostic context disambiguation
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12579200B1 patent drawing
  • US12579200B1 patent drawing
  • US12579200B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a method includes receiving a user input including a text string from a client system, identifying a first topic embedding from among multiple topic embeddings based on an embedding associated with the user input, wherein each embedding associated with the user input or each topic embedding is withing an n-dimensional embedding space, identifying first entities associated with the user input, identifying entity embeddings based on the first entities, wherein each entity embedding is within the n-dimensional embedding space, generating a respective n-sphere based on each entity embedding and the first topic, wherein each n-sphere is associated with a respective set of document fragments, retrieving one or more sets of document fragments associated with the n-spheres, and sending instructions for presenting the retrieved sets of document fragments to the client system responsive to the user input.