Context-Based Hazard Alerts for User Location and Activity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Interconnected hazard detection systems in homes are ineffective when no one is present, as alarms may not prevent property damage or protect users from hazardous substances like carbon monoxide, especially in situations where users are disoriented or more susceptible due to their activities.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes motion detecting modules and a computer server system to customize hazard notifications based on user activity, adjusting threshold or volume settings and generating notifications based on user location and activity data, ensuring timely and effective alerts even when users are not directly near the hazard detector.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional interconnected hazard detection systems are used, then hazard detection capability is provided, but the system is ineffective when no one is present or when users are disoriented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection effectivenessVSAvoidnotification adaptability to user context
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The notification system dynamically adapts its behavior based on real-time motion detection data. Motion detection modules continuously monitor user presence and activity in different zones, and the system adjusts notification methods accordingly - using local alarms when users are present and mobile notifications when zones are unoccupied. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between maintaining reliable hazard detection and adapting to varying user contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where motion detection modules provide continuous information about user presence and activity state to the server. The server processes this feedback and adjusts notification strategies in real-time. This feedback mechanism enables the system to respond appropriately to user context, resolving the contradiction by making hazard detection effectiveness dependent on actual user presence and state information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If standard alarm notifications are used, then hazard alerts are provided, but users may not respond effectively when disoriented or engaged in activities that reduce awareness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser response effectivenessVSAvoidcontext information about user state
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring and analyzing user motion patterns before a hazard event occurs. Motion detection modules track user presence, location, and activity state in advance, building a contextual understanding of user behavior. When a hazard is detected, this pre-collected information enables immediate customization of notifications based on the user's current state, improving response effectiveness without losing critical context information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes notification parameters (delivery method, timing, target device) based on detected user activity parameters. Motion detection data provides information about user state, and the system adjusts notification parameters accordingly - such as sending alerts to mobile devices when users are in low-activity states or potentially disoriented. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by preserving context information and using it to enhance user response effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If motion detection modules and activity tracking are added, then context-based notifications are enabled, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotification customization capabilityVSAvoidsystem component quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Motion detection modules serve multiple functions within the system - they detect user presence for security purposes, track activity patterns for context awareness, and provide location information for notification routing. By making these components multi-functional, the system achieves high notification adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity. The same hardware infrastructure supports multiple capabilities, resolving the contradiction between versatility and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

A centralized server acts as an intermediary that handles the complex processing and decision-making logic. Rather than distributing complex algorithms across multiple devices, the server consolidates the intelligence required for context-based notification customization. This intermediary approach enables sophisticated adaptability while keeping individual device components relatively simple, resolving the contradiction between notification customization capability and system component complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10262507B2Smart-home hazard detection system providing context-based user notifications
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 GOOGLE LLC
  • US10262507B2 patent drawing
  • US10262507B2 patent drawing
  • US10262507B2 patent drawing

AI summary

System for customizing hazard notifications based on user activity includes a hazard detector and a computer server system communicatively coupled to the hazard detector. The hazard detector detects a hazard level that is greater than a threshold setting, the hazard level indicating an amount of smoke or carbon monoxide present at the hazard detector. The hazard detector generates hazard data indicating the detection of the hazard level and transmits the hazard data to the computer server system. The computer server system associates a location with the hazard detector. Activity data indicating a user location is received at the computer server system and the hazard data is received at the computer server system. The computer server system generates a notification based on the hazard location and the user location in response to receiving the hazard data.