Context-Aware Image Annotation for Accurate AI Model Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inaccurate or irrelevant image annotations hinder efficient utilization of media content data within enterprises, leading to inefficient image data resource use and suboptimal performance of artificial intelligence applications.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes context and annotation models to assign annotations to images, prioritizes images requiring additional annotation based on enterprise factors, and stores them in a central database for retrieval, allowing for retraining of AI models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated annotation models are used to annotate images, then productivity is improved, but annotation accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation throughputVSAvoidannotation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The annotation process is segmented into multiple stages: initial automated annotation by AI models, quality assessment of annotations, prioritization of images needing additional annotation, and selective manual annotation. This segmentation allows automated processing for most images while applying manual review only where needed, thus maintaining high productivity while improving accuracy for critical cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where annotation quality is continuously assessed, and results are used to prioritize which images need additional manual annotation. The feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from annotation outcomes and adjust prioritization strategies, improving both accuracy and efficiency over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If manual annotation is performed for all images, then annotation accuracy is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation accuracyVSAvoidannotation throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of applying manual annotation to all images (excessive action), the system applies partial manual annotation only to images that fail automated quality assessment or are prioritized for additional annotation. This partial approach maintains high accuracy where needed while preserving overall productivity by avoiding unnecessary manual work on already adequate annotations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated annotation models perform self-service by generating initial annotations that are then assessed for quality. This self-service capability allows the system to handle the majority of annotation tasks automatically, with manual intervention reserved only for cases where the automated system identifies potential issues, thus maintaining high productivity without sacrificing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If images are stored in distributed locations, then ease of operation is improved, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage accessibilityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges distributed image storage into a centralized repository while maintaining accessibility through network access. This consolidation eliminates redundant storage across multiple locations, improving resource utilization efficiency by allowing deduplication and centralized management, while ease of operation is maintained through standardized access interfaces and network connectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If AI models are retrained frequently, then annotation accuracy is improved, but use of energy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic retraining of AI models based on accumulated annotation data and performance metrics, rather than frequent continuous retraining. This periodic approach allows the system to maintain high accuracy by updating models with fresh data while conserving computational energy by avoiding unnecessary retraining cycles, thus resolving the contradiction between accuracy and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20250336223A1Image data annotation and model training platform
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 TARGET BRANDS INC
  • US20250336223A1 patent drawing
  • US20250336223A1 patent drawing
  • US20250336223A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A platform for data collection, and in particular image collection, and model building therefrom is disclosed. In examples, received media content data, including image data, may be assigned a context category, and one or more context-specific models may be used to automatically annotate the image. Accuracy monitoring of the image annotations may indicate a need to manually annotate images for subsequent training. A priority may be assigned to one or more images, such that images may be queued for additional annotation. Such additional annotations may be used for model retraining. In some instances, a separate classification model may be used to identify a context category for image data from among predetermined contexts.