Context-Informative Co-Citation Graph for Research Document Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Researchers face challenges in locating recent advances in a particular field due to existing mechanisms that rely on analyzing bibliographies and co-citations, which often lack context on why documents are co-cited, leading to inefficiencies in document searching and analysis.

Innovation Solution

A context-informative co-citation graph is generated using data extraction from research documents, including titles, authors, and text analysis to provide visual navigation and contextual information on co-citations, allowing users to understand why specific documents are co-cited, thereby reducing the time spent on research.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If conventional co-citation search methods are used to locate related research documents, then the quantity of relevant documents can be identified, but the researcher cannot understand why these documents are co-cited, leading to loss of information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontext informationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary component that extracts and processes citation contexts from research documents. This intermediary layer analyzes the textual content surrounding citations and generates explanatory information about why documents are co-cited, thereby recovering the lost context information without requiring the researcher to manually analyze numerous documents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of manual document analysis with an automated computational system. The system automatically extracts citation contexts, processes the text to identify relationships between cited documents, and presents synthesized information to researchers, eliminating the need for manual review of each document's bibliography.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If researchers manually analyze bibliographies of research documents to locate related documents, then they can identify some relevant documents, but this process is time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresearch efficiencyVSAvoidtime for document analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-extracting and storing citation context information from research documents in an organized format. Before researchers need to conduct their analysis, the system has already processed the documents, identified co-citation relationships, and prepared contextual explanations, thereby eliminating the time-consuming manual analysis phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified copies or representations of the complex citation relationships. Instead of requiring researchers to examine original documents and their bibliographies, the system generates condensed representations that capture the essential co-citation relationships and contextual information in an easily consumable format.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Loss of time

If researchers use co-citation counting systems to locate related documents, then they can quickly identify co-cited documents, but they still must analyze numerous documents to understand the context of co-citations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to locate documentsVSAvoidease of document analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple functions into a single integrated system: document location, co-citation identification, and contextual analysis. Instead of requiring researchers to separately locate documents and then analyze them for context, the system combines these operations and presents both the documents and their contextual relationships in a unified interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension to co-citation analysis by incorporating textual context information. Rather than presenting only quantitative co-citation counts, the system adds a qualitative dimension that explains the reasons for co-citations through extracted text analysis, thereby making the information more actionable for researchers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS9075873B2Generation of context-informative co-citation graphs
Publication Date: 2015.07.07 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US9075873B2 patent drawing
  • US9075873B2 patent drawing
  • US9075873B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are technologies pertaining to generating co-citation graphs. A context-informative co-citation graph includes a first node that represents a first research document, a second node that represents a second research document, and a third node that represents a third research document that includes a citation to both the first research document and the second research document. The context-informative co-citation graph also includes a first edge that couples the first node and the third node, and a second edge that couples the second node and the third node. The two edges visually indicate that the first research document and the second research document are co-cited by the third research document. The context-informative co-citation graph further includes at least a portion of a sentence in the third research document that includes a citation to at least one of the first research document or the second research document.