Context-Aware Row Sensing for Harvester Steering Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural harvesters struggle to differentiate between crop plants and weeds or grass using tactile-based sensors, leading to undesired steering when encountering non-crop areas, such as drainage or weedy regions, which can disrupt manual steering and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that utilizes contextual inputs, including maps, optical sensors, crop height sensors, and operator inputs, to determine when to ignore tactile-based row sensing data and switch to manual or GPS-based steering, ensuring accurate alignment with crop rows.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If tactile-based row sensing guidance is used to automatically steer the agricultural work machine, then the machine can follow crop rows automatically, but it cannot differentiate between crop plants and weeds or grass, leading to undesired steering in non-crop areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic steeringVSAvoidsteering accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system (optical sensors, GPS, context-aware control logic) between the tactile sensor and the steering mechanism. This intermediary layer filters and validates tactile sensor signals by cross-referencing them with optical sensor data and geographic location information, preventing false steering commands in non-crop areas while maintaining automatic steering capability in valid crop rows

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the purely tactile/mechanical sensing system with a multi-sensor system that incorporates optical sensors and GPS-based geographic information. This substitution allows the system to distinguish between crop plants and weeds by using optical characteristics and location data, thereby improving steering accuracy while maintaining automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If the harvester encounters non-crop areas such as drainage or weedy regions, then the tactile sensor detects plants and triggers steering adjustments, but this causes undesired steering and disrupts manual steering and efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplant detectionVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary validation layer that checks whether detected plants are in valid crop row locations using GPS and prior maps. Optical sensors serve as intermediaries to verify plant characteristics before triggering steering adjustments. This prevents false responses to weeds or grass in non-crop areas, maintaining operational efficiency while preserving accurate crop row detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors steering commands and validates them against multiple data sources (optical sensors, GPS location, prior maps). When a tactile sensor detects plants, the system provides feedback by cross-checking with other sensors before executing steering adjustments, preventing undesired steering in non-crop areas while maintaining responsive crop row following

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If contextual information from prior maps and optical sensors is used to selectively ignore tactile sensor data, then navigation accuracy in non-crop areas is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multi-functionality by using the GPS system for both location tracking and context-aware validation of tactile sensor data. The optical sensors serve multiple purposes: detecting crop rows, identifying non-crop areas, and providing validation data for steering decisions. This universal approach improves navigation accuracy while minimizing the addition of separate dedicated systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple sensing functions into an integrated control system. GPS location data, optical sensor information, and tactile sensor signals are combined and processed together to make steering decisions. This consolidation improves navigation accuracy through contextual awareness while managing system complexity by integrating functions rather than adding separate independent systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250318465A1Context-based row sensing guidance control
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 DEERE & CO
  • US20250318465A1 patent drawing
  • US20250318465A1 patent drawing
  • US20250318465A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method includes performing row sensing guidance to guide steering of an agricultural work machine through a field, having a row of crop, based on at least 3 one signal from a tactile-based row sensor that detects plants striking the tactile-based row sensor. The method includes obtaining a prior map that includes context information mapped to one or more locations in the field, determining a geographical position of the agricultural work machine during the row sensing guidance, obtaining the context information from the prior map based on the geographic position of the agricultural work machine and, based on the context information from the prior map, selectively guiding steering of the agricultural work machine based on a different steering source than the row sensing guidance.