Context-Sensitive Cluster Analysis for Business Intelligence

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional Business Intelligence (BI) systems are complex, difficult to deploy and customize, and struggle with unstructured data, making them costly and resource-intensive, while lacking the ability to analyze the impact of populations on calculated metrics, which hinders organizations from gaining competitive business intelligence.

Innovation Solution

The development of apparatus, systems, and methods for dynamic on-demand context-sensitive cluster analysis in BI systems, allowing for real-time analysis of multi-dimensional data sets by selecting relevant dimension members, computing dimensional scores, and ranking them based on influence on metrics, using cloud-based computing and client-server architectures to facilitate cost-effective and resource-efficient intelligence generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional BI systems are used to process and analyze organizational data, then calculations of various metrics can be performed, but the system complexity and deployment difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetric calculation capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the core analytical function from complex traditional BI systems by implementing a streamlined dimension member scoring system that directly computes influence scores without requiring the full overhead of traditional BI infrastructure. This separates the essential metric analysis capability from the surrounding complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically determines current context and selects relevant dimension members without requiring manual configuration or complex system setup. The automated context determination and dynamic selection processes enable the system to serve itself, reducing deployment complexity while maintaining metric calculation precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional BI systems are customized for specific applications, then department-specific needs can be met, but the deployment difficulty and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepartment-specific customizationVSAvoiddeployment difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts to different departmental needs by automatically determining current context and selecting relevant dimension members based on the specific application scenario. This dynamic adaptation eliminates the need for static customization while maintaining department-specific relevance, making deployment easier while preserving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The dimension member scoring system serves multiple departmental functions through a single unified approach. By computing influence scores based on contextual relevance, the same core mechanism handles diverse departmental requirements without requiring separate customized deployments, thereby improving ease of operation while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of information

If comprehensive data analysis is performed on all dimension members, then complete metric impact assessment is achieved, but the computational resources and time required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplete metric impact assessmentVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial analysis by focusing computational resources only on dimension members relevant to the current context. By computing influence scores selectively for context-relevant dimension members rather than all dimension members, the system achieves sufficient metric impact assessment without the time cost of comprehensive analysis of every possible dimension member.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The analysis process is segmented into context determination, relevant dimension member selection, and focused scoring computation. This segmentation allows the system to divide the comprehensive analysis task into manageable stages, processing only the necessary subset of dimension members while preserving the ability to assess complete metric impact when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of energy

If cloud-based computing is used for on-demand analysis, then infrastructure costs are reduced, but the need for real-time context determination and dynamic selection increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfrastructure costVSAvoidcontext determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cloud-based system automatically determines current context and selects relevant dimension members through automated processes without requiring complex manual configuration or infrastructure management. This self-service approach handles the contextual complexity internally while presenting a simplified interface, reducing infrastructure costs while managing complexity through automation rather than manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8898175B2Apparatus, systems and methods for dynamic on-demand context sensitive cluster analysis
Publication Date: 2014.11.25 VISIER SOLUTIONS
  • US8898175B2 patent drawing
  • US8898175B2 patent drawing
  • US8898175B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A particular method includes selecting a subset of a plurality of dimension members of a multi-dimensional data set. The method also includes computing a plurality of dimensional scores for the dimension members in the selected subset. Each dimensional score is associated with a particular dimension member in the subset and is a measure of a dimensional influence of the associated dimension member on a metric associated with the multi-dimensional data set. A dimension member with greater dimensional influence affects a value of the metric over a population more than a dimension member with less dimensional influence. The method further includes ranking the dimension members in the selected subset based on the dimensional scores.