Context-Specific Image Annotation with Selective Model Retraining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inaccurate or irrelevant image annotations hinder enterprise use of media content, and existing artificial intelligence models require regular re-training to maintain accuracy, leading to inefficient image data resource utilization due to piecemeal storage and human error.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes context-specific annotation models to assign initial annotations, prioritizes images for further annotation based on enterprise factors, and stores them in a central database for retrieval, with AI models determining the need for re-training using annotated images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If artificial intelligence models are used to annotate images automatically, then productivity is improved, but annotation accuracy deteriorates due to model limitations and lack of re-training

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation speedVSAvoidannotation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The annotation process is segmented into multiple stages: initial automated annotation by AI models, quality assessment of annotations, and selective manual review/revision. This segmentation allows the system to leverage automated efficiency while ensuring accuracy through targeted human intervention only when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where annotated images are assessed for quality, and those failing to meet accuracy thresholds are returned for re-annotation or manual review. The assessed annotations are also used to re-train AI models, improving their performance over time and creating continuous quality improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If all images are annotated manually to ensure accuracy, then annotation accuracy is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to time-consuming manual processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation accuracyVSAvoidannotation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of manually annotating all images, the system applies partial manual action only to images that fail automated quality assessment. The majority of images are processed automatically with sufficient accuracy, while only a subset requiring improvement receives manual attention, optimizing the balance between speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If images are stored in piecemeal fashion across different users, then ease of operation is improved for individual users, but loss of information deteriorates due to inefficient resource utilization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual accessVSAvoidimage data resource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges previously scattered image data into a centralized repository that all enterprise users can access. This consolidation eliminates redundant storage, enables efficient resource utilization, and maintains user accessibility through a unified interface, resolving the contradiction between individual ease of operation and overall resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If AI models are re-trained frequently to maintain accuracy, then annotation accuracy is improved, but loss of time deteriorates due to re-training overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidre-training time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic re-training of AI models based on accumulated assessment data rather than continuous re-training. Annotations are assessed and fed back to models at intervals, allowing models to maintain accuracy through scheduled updates while minimizing the time overhead associated with frequent re-training operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12380715B2Image data annotation and model training platform
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 TARGET BRANDS INC
  • US12380715B2 patent drawing
  • US12380715B2 patent drawing
  • US12380715B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A platform for data collection, and in particular image collection, and model building therefrom is disclosed. In examples, received media content data, including image data, may be assigned a context category, and one or more context-specific models may be used to automatically annotate the image. Accuracy monitoring of the image annotations may indicate a need to manually annotate images for subsequent training. A priority may be assigned to one or more images, such that images may be queued for additional annotation. Such additional annotations may be used for model retraining. In some instances, a separate classification model may be used to identify a context category for image data from among predetermined contexts.