Context-Based Word Evaluation for Ambiguous Meaning Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining word familiarity assign varying evaluation values due to ambiguity in word meanings, leading to inconsistent and inaccurate representations of familiarity across individuals.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that acquires word evaluation values by displaying a document composed of sentences, allowing users to select and evaluate words with predetermined index values, applying decorations based on the evaluation results to limit ambiguity and specify word meanings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If subject experiments are used to determine word familiarity by presenting words to multiple persons, then a statistical average can be obtained, but evaluation values greatly differ when words have multiple meanings leading to high distribution and inaccurate representation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveword familiarity measurement accuracyVSAvoidcontextual meaning information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the evaluation process into two distinct parts: first evaluating the word form itself, then evaluating the word within its contextual sentence. This segmentation allows separate measurement of general familiarity and context-specific understanding, resolving the contradiction by capturing both dimensions without letting ambiguity dominate the overall evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces sentences as an intermediary element between the word and the evaluator. The sentence provides contextual information that mediates the evaluation process, helping evaluators understand the specific meaning being assessed and reducing variations caused by ambiguous word interpretations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If words with multiple meanings are evaluated without contextual information, then evaluation can be performed quickly, but the evaluation value depends heavily on individual interpretation of ambiguity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation speedVSAvoidevaluation consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation process is divided into two sequential stages: word-level evaluation for speed and context-level evaluation for reliability. The first stage maintains high productivity by evaluating words in isolation, while the second stage improves reliability by providing contextual disambiguation, achieving both speed and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary word evaluation before providing contextual information. This preliminary action captures general familiarity quickly, then contextual sentences are added to refine the evaluation for ambiguous words, maintaining overall efficiency while improving consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If contextual sentences are provided during word evaluation, then word meaning ambiguity is reduced, but the evaluation process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveword meaning specificityVSAvoidevaluation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation system is segmented into modular components: word presentation, sentence context provision, and separate evaluation phases. This modular segmentation reduces overall complexity by allowing each component to be independently optimized and processed in a systematic sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Contextual sentences are prepared and presented in advance before the actual evaluation occurs. This preliminary action simplifies the evaluation process by pre-establishing the context, so evaluators don't need to analyze complex relationships during the evaluation itself, reducing perceived complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12586264B2Word evaluation value acquisition method, apparatus and program
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 NT T INC
  • US12586264B2 patent drawing
  • US12586264B2 patent drawing
  • US12586264B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A word evaluation value acquisition method, including a document display step in which a display unit 300 displays a document composed of a plurality of sentences, a word selection reception step in which an input unit 200 receives selection of a word included in the document, a word evaluation reception step in which the input unit 200 receives an evaluation result indicating any of the plurality of index values with respect to a selected word that is the word whose selection has been received in the word selection reception step, and a decoration step in which the display unit 300 applies a decoration allocated to an index value corresponding to the evaluation result received in the word evaluation reception step to the selected word and a word having the same spelling as the selected word included in the document.