Contextual Execution System for Dynamic Task Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional task execution systems lack adaptability and efficiency due to static configurations, requiring manual intervention and failing to adapt to changing requirements.

Innovation Solution

A contextual execution system that dynamically updates task contexts based on execution outcomes, identifying missing data fields and system states to autonomously execute tasks and adapt to evolving conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If static configurations are used in task execution systems, then system simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to changing requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing requirementsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic context updates where the system automatically modifies task contexts based on execution outcomes. The context is no longer static but evolves over time as the system learns from failures and successes, enabling adaptability to changing requirements without manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where execution outcomes are fed back into the context update process. When a task fails, the system identifies missing data fields or system states and updates the context accordingly, creating a self-correcting loop that improves adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If manual intervention is required for task execution, then system complexity is reduced, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution efficiencyVSAvoidmanual intervention level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically identifying missing data fields and system states through execution outcome analysis. It autonomously updates contexts and executes tasks without requiring manual intervention, thereby improving productivity while maintaining appropriate system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If static task contexts are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability deteriorates due to inability to adapt to failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution reliabilityVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from execution outcomes to automatically update task contexts, improving reliability by adapting to failures. The feedback loop identifies missing data fields or system states and modifies the context accordingly, ensuring more reliable task execution without complicating user operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-diagnosis and self-correction by automatically identifying execution failures and updating contexts without user intervention. This maintains ease of operation while significantly improving reliability through autonomous adaptation to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240385825A1Techniques for automated processing of computational tasks
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 SETUPLY INC
  • US20240385825A1 patent drawing
  • US20240385825A1 patent drawing
  • US20240385825A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure describes techniques for executing operations associated with a computational task based on a context associated with the task. The context may represent at least one of: (i) a data field that an example system needs to automatically execute the task associated with the task or (ii) a system state that the example system needs to trigger to automatically execute the task associated with the task. In some examples, the example system updates the context over time and based on execution outcomes associated with prior executions of the task or similar tasks. For example, if the prior execution outcomes illustrate that those executions have failed to provide a required data field, the example system may update the context associated with the task to identify the missing data field. Accordingly, in some examples, the techniques described herein enable dynamically updating task contexts over time and based on past execution outcomes.