Contextual Metadata Ranking for Data Insight Relevance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack the ability to effectively generate relevant insights from structured and unstructured data by failing to consider contextual metadata and user activities, leading to inefficient data analysis and presentation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that analyze queries to derive contextual metadata, identify relevant topics, and formulate additional queries to retrieve insights, incorporating user metadata to present structured and unstructured data in a structured arrangement, enhancing data analytics by focusing on user context.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional data retrieval systems are used without contextual metadata analysis, then the system complexity is low, but the relevance and quality of generated insights deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance of insightsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of queries to derive contextual metadata before executing data retrieval operations. This preliminary action includes analyzing query structure, identifying user intent, and extracting contextual information that will guide subsequent insight generation, thereby improving relevance without adding complex real-time processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Contextual metadata acts as an intermediary between the query and the data retrieval process. The metadata captures user context, query semantics, and relevant parameters, serving as a bridge that enhances insight relevance without requiring direct complex interactions between all system components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If contextual metadata and user activities are incorporated into query analysis, then the relevance of generated insights improves, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance of insightsVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

User metadata and contextual information are collected and prepared in advance before insight generation is requested. This preliminary preparation includes caching user preferences, activity patterns, and contextual data that can be quickly applied during query processing, reducing actual processing time while maintaining high relevance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies contextual metadata and user activities selectively based on query requirements. Not all queries require full contextual analysis - the system performs partial analysis appropriate to each query's needs, balancing processing time with insight relevance by avoiding excessive analysis for simple queries

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Quantity of substance

If additional queries are formulated based on contextual metadata, then the quantity of relevant insights increases, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of insightsVSAvoidquery formulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically formulates additional queries based on derived contextual metadata without requiring manual intervention. The contextual metadata itself guides the generation of follow-up queries, enabling the system to serve itself by autonomously expanding the analysis based on identified user context and relevant parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Contextual metadata from initial query analysis provides feedback that automatically triggers formulation of additional queries. The system uses the insights gained from contextual analysis to generate follow-up queries that further explore relevant topics, creating a feedback loop that increases insight quantity while automating the complexity management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11481403B2Ranking contextual metadata to generate relevant data insights
Publication Date: 2022.10.25 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US11481403B2 patent drawing
  • US11481403B2 patent drawing
  • US11481403B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects extend to methods, systems, and computer program products for ranking contextual metadata to generate relevant data insights. Aspects of the invention can be used to enhance data analytics by automatically deriving relevance signals used to generate insights closely related to the context in which a user is exploring or analyzing data. User experiences can include embedded data visualizations, search engines, and natural language querying systems to help users understand their data more effectively. By utilizing metrics on the relevance information, insights related and/or relevant to the context in which the user is analyzing data can be created. Thus, relevance information can define a scope for a variety of automatically generated insights of data. Insight generation can be based on computed relevance signals that target areas interesting to users.