Contextualized Knowledge Base for Personalized Content Recommendation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing online learning management systems fail to provide content to learners in a structured and personalized manner, neglecting factors such as learning adaptability, prior knowledge, time constraints, and behavioral traits, which limits the effectiveness of content recommendation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilizes a processor to identify a subset of a knowledge base based on a learner's academic and behavioral context, structures content based on a learning strategy, and recommends it using a prioritization module, considering factors like academic ability, effort, and predisposition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional online learning management systems provide content based only on learner's explicit actions or requests, then the system operation is simple, but the personalization and effectiveness of content recommendation is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoidcontent personalization effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring learner interactions with content and using this information to refine future recommendations. The processor analyzes learner responses, engagement patterns, and performance data to dynamically adjust content selection, creating a closed-loop system that improves personalization over time while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer between the content repository and the learner. This intermediary processor analyzes multiple learner attributes (explicit actions, implicit behaviors, performance metrics) and mediates content selection by matching learners with appropriate content subsets, thereby enhancing personalization without requiring complex direct learner-content matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the system considers multiple learner factors (learning adaptability, prior knowledge, time constraints, behavioral traits), then the personalization accuracy is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the content repository into multiple subsets organized by different criteria (topic, difficulty level, format, duration). The processor selectively draws from these pre-segmented subsets based on learner characteristics, avoiding the need to evaluate all content items individually. This segmentation enables accurate personalization while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular content organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs parameter changes by dynamically adjusting content selection based on varying learner parameters (prior knowledge level, available time, learning style preferences). The processor modifies content attributes such as difficulty, length, and format to match learner parameters, achieving high personalization accuracy through systematic parameter matching rather than complex system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If the system provides unstructured content recommendations, then the implementation is straightforward, but the learning outcomes and learner engagement are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidlearning outcomes effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-organizing content into structured subsets with defined attributes (topic categories, difficulty levels, estimated completion time, format types). This pre-structuring occurs before content delivery, enabling the processor to quickly assemble personalized learning paths without complex real-time processing, thereby maintaining implementation simplicity while improving learning outcomes through systematic content organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by creating adaptive learning paths that adjust content sequence and selection based on learner progress and performance. The system dynamically restructures content delivery plans as learners interact with materials, modifying subsequent recommendations to optimize learning outcomes. This dynamic restructuring is achieved through rule-based logic that maintains implementation simplicity while delivering personalized structured content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11416558B2System and method for recommending personalized content using contextualized knowledge base
Publication Date: 2022.08.16 INDIAVIDUAL LEARNING LTD
  • US11416558B2 patent drawing
  • US11416558B2 patent drawing
  • US11416558B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for recommending content for use, by a learner is provided. The system includes a processor in communication with a memory. The memory stores a knowledge base. The processor is configured for identifying a subset of the knowledge base, based on the academic context of the learner and for identifying a first set of content tagged to interlinked nodes of the subset of knowledge base. The processor is configured for identifying a second set of content from the first set of content, based on the behavioral context and the characteristics of the learner. The processor is configured for identifying a learning path for the learner, based on a learning strategy for the learner and a score assigned to a concept. The processor is configured for structuring the identified second set of content for recommending to the learner, based on the identified learning path.