Continual Learning Model Universality Detection for Knowledge Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current detection methods for continual learning models fail to account for the growth potential and storage of universal knowledge, limiting the exploration and improvement of continual learning scenarios, and do not effectively explain changes in language universal representation during continual learning.

Innovation Solution

Perform classification task test processing on a continual learning language model and a single-task language model using a task set, and test processing on text universal representations using a probe task set to determine a final universal detection result, indicating the association between the universal representation capabilities of both models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If continual learning is performed to improve adaptability across multiple tasks, then the universal representation capability may deteriorate due to catastrophic forgetting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracy across multiple tasksVSAvoidtext universal representation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism by using a probe task set to continuously monitor and evaluate the universal representation capability of the language model during continual learning. The evaluation results feed back into the learning process to adjust training strategies, preventing catastrophic forgetting while maintaining adaptability across tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary evaluation of universal representation capability before continuing with continual learning. By assessing the model's current state using probe tasks, the system can take preventive actions to preserve universal knowledge before it deteriorates, ensuring reliable multi-task performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If separate models are trained for each classification task to maintain high accuracy, then the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidnumber of models required
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a single continual learning language model that is designed to perform multiple classification tasks universally. By evaluating and preserving the model's universal representation capability through probe tasks, the system achieves high classification accuracy across different tasks without requiring separate specialized models for each task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the language model learns multiple tasks sequentially to improve versatility, then the storage of universal knowledge may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability to learn multiple tasksVSAvoiduniversal knowledge storage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The probe task set serves as a feedback mechanism that continuously monitors the model's universal knowledge retention. By evaluating performance on probe tasks throughout the continual learning process, the system can detect information loss early and adjust training to preserve universal knowledge while acquiring new task-specific knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of universal knowledge storage capacity before proceeding with sequential task learning. This allows the system to establish baseline universal knowledge and take preventive measures to preserve it during the sequential learning process, preventing information loss before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250217714A1Universality detection for continual learning model
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 TENCENT TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO LTD
  • US20250217714A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217714A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217714A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of universality detection includes performing respective classification task test processing on a continual learning language model and a single-task language model by using a first task set associated with a first classification task, to obtain a first classification accuracy of the continual learning language model and a second classification accuracy of the single-task language model. The method also includes performing a first test processing on a first text universal representation of the continual learning language model, to obtain a first test result associated with the continual learning language model; performing a second test processing on a second text universal representation of the initial pre-trained language model, to obtain a second test result associated with the initial pre-trained language model; and determining a final universal detection result according to the first classification accuracy, the second classification accuracy, the first test result and the second test result.