Continuous 3D Printing of Rolled Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D printing techniques using pre-manufactured sheets are slow due to their discrete layer stacking approach, limiting design exploration and unable to replicate the rich textures of materials like felt or fabric, while existing fast methods are not suitable for printing soft fabric objects.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for 3D printing that involves advancing a continuous material past a cutting head, cutting it along desired paths, applying adhesive, and spirally winding it onto a spool, allowing for faster printing by using a more continuous process and accommodating various materials like fabric, felt, and paper.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a discrete layer stacking approach is used for 3D printing, then the fabrication process is simple to implement, but the printing speed is very slow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidprinting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a continuous printing process where material is fed continuously through the system and cut in real-time according to the digital model, eliminating the discrete layer-by-layer deposition. The material moves continuously past the cutting head which follows the paths of the model, allowing uninterrupted processing and achieving speeds over 100 meters/min.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical layer stacking with a cutting-based approach where a cutting head (laser or blade) follows digital paths through continuously fed material. This substitution of the mechanical assembly process with a cutting and winding process enables continuous operation and dramatically increased printing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional 3D printing methods are used, then material availability is limited, but the rich textures of materials like felt or fabric cannot be replicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial availabilityVSAvoidtexture representation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal printing system that can process multiple material types (fabric, felt, paper, leather) through a common continuous feeding and cutting mechanism. The system is not limited to proprietary 3D printing materials but can work with any rollable material, achieving both versatility in material selection and high-quality texture representation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If low-fidelity prototyping is used to trade accuracy for speed, then printing time is reduced, but accuracy of representation is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting speedVSAvoidaccuracy of representation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the printing process by moving from discrete layer deposition to continuous material feeding with precision cutting. This parameter change enables both high speed (continuous process) and high accuracy (precision cutting following digital paths), eliminating the need to trade off between speed and fidelity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces printing time, achieving speeds up to 10× faster than traditional methods, enhancing design interactivity and allowing for the creation of complex 3D fabric objects with improved texture representation.

Implementation Method 1

The cutting head can include a laser for cutting the material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 2

providing adhesive on a surface of the material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS10618216B23D printing of rolled materials
Publication Date: 2020.04.14 CORNELL UNIVERSITY
  • US10618216B2 patent drawing
  • US10618216B2 patent drawing
  • US10618216B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A shape can be 3D printed by advancing a continuous length of material past a cutting head, cutting the material along one or more paths, providing adhesive on a surface of the material, and spirally winding the material onto a spool, such that the cut paths on each layer of the spiral are in alignment according to the 3D printed shape. A 3D printing system includes a material infeed configured to provide a supply of sheet material, a cutting head for cutting the material, a glue applicator, and a gathering spindle configured to rotate such that the material is spirally wound onto the spindle.