Continuous Emulsion Aggregation System for Toner Particle Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Batch processes for producing emulsion aggregation toner particles are inefficient, taking long times, resulting in inconsistent products and difficulties in producing small-sized particles due to high viscosity and heat transfer limitations, while continuous processes face challenges in achieving consistent particle size and high yield.

Innovation Solution

A continuous emulsion aggregation system using a series of sequentially connected stirred tank reactors, where materials flow continuously through each reactor, allowing for independent control of mixing rates, temperatures, and pH, enabling the production of small-sized toner particles with tight size distribution and high yield without reducing solids content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If batch processes are used for producing emulsion aggregation toner particles, then the process can be simple to operate, but the production time is long and productivity is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess operation simplicityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The batch process is segmented into multiple continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) connected in series, where each reactor performs a specific function (emulsification, aggregation, coalescence). This segmentation allows continuous operation while maintaining operational simplicity, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from batch to continuous operation, where materials flow continuously through the series of CSTRs. This continuity eliminates idle times between batches and maintains productive action throughout, significantly improving productivity while the automated continuous flow keeps operation simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Device complexity

If batch processes are used for producing emulsion aggregation toner particles, then equipment complexity can be reduced, but manufacturing precision and product consistency are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment complexityVSAvoidparticle size consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The process is divided into multiple CSTRs in series, each with independent control. This segmentation allows precise control of reaction conditions at each stage, improving particle size consistency. While the number of reactors increases device complexity, the modular nature keeps it manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each CSTR in the series can be independently controlled with feedback mechanisms to maintain optimal conditions (temperature, mixing rate, pH). This feedback control ensures consistent particle size and product quality, resolving the precision consistency issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If batch processes are used for producing small-sized toner particles, then the process can be straightforward, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to high viscosity and stirring efficiency issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidparticle size distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The emulsification and aggregation steps are segmented into separate CSTRs, allowing optimized conditions for each stage. The high viscosity issue is addressed by performing emulsification first in a dedicated reactor before aggregation, where the continuous stirring and controlled addition of coagulant enable precise particle size control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic control of mixing rates and residence times in each CSTR. By adjusting stirring speed and flow rates dynamically, the process maintains optimal conditions for forming small particles with tight size distribution, overcoming the limitations of static batch processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If continuous processes are used for producing toner particles, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision and particle size consistency become difficult to achieve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction rateVSAvoidparticle size consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous process is segmented into multiple CSTRs in series, each performing a specific function with independent control. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high productivity through continuous operation while achieving precise control over particle size at each stage, resolving the contradiction between productivity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system controls particle size consistency by dynamically adjusting parameters (temperature, mixing rate, pH, residence time) in each CSTR. These parameter changes are optimized to maintain tight particle size distribution while preserving continuous high-rate production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system efficiently produces small-sized toner particles with a tight size distribution and high yield, overcoming the inefficiencies and inconsistencies of batch processes, and achieving consistent particle production.

Implementation Method 1

A continuous emulsion aggregation system using a series of sequentially connected stirred tank reactors, where materials flow continuously through each reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStirring: Stirring

Implementation Method 2

allowing for independent control of mixing rates, temperatures, and pH

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

allowing for independent control of mixing rates, temperatures, and pH

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Implementation Method 4

latex polymers utilized in the formation of EA type toners may be formed by batch or semi-continuous emulsion polymerization

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEmulsion polymerization: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 5

production of emulsion aggregation (EA) toner particles via a series of continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTR)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAggregation: Coagulation

Implementation Method 6

at least one reactor for facilitating a coalescence process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoalescence: Coagulation

Data Source

PatentUS8916098B2Continuous emulsification-aggregation process for the production of particles
Publication Date: 2014.12.23 XEROX CORP
  • US8916098B2 patent drawing
  • US8916098B2 patent drawing
  • US8916098B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A continuous emulsion aggregation process for the production of particles is presented including a plurality of continuous stirred-tank reactors (CSTR). The plurality of continuous stirred-tank reactors includes at least one feed tank of raw materials, at least one reactor for facilitating cold addition, at least two reactors for facilitating an aggregation process, at least one reactor for facilitating a shell addition process; at least one reactor for facilitating a freeze process, at least one reactor for facilitating a chelating process, at least one reactor for facilitating a ramp-up process and at least one reactor for facilitating a coalescence process, wherein the reactors are sequentially assembled in a series configuration and separated by short conduits to produce toner particles that are narrowly distributed.