Continuous Emulsion Aggregation for Toner Particle Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing emulsion aggregation processes for toner production in electrophotographic devices are inefficient, requiring long processing times, leading to inconsistent batch-to-batch results and environmental concerns due to handling of bulk materials and high energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

A continuous emulsion aggregation system utilizing a series of temperature-controlled continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) with sequential assembly and orifice plate separation, allowing for continuous material flow and independent rate control of raw materials to achieve consistent toner particle production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If batch or semi-continuous emulsion polymerization is used to form latex polymers, then the process can handle bulk materials, but the processing time becomes very long and batch-to-batch consistency is difficult to achieve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidbatch-to-batch consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a continuous emulsion aggregation process where latex polymer, colorant, and other materials flow continuously through a series of reactors (CSTRs) rather than being processed in discrete batches. This continuous flow eliminates the start-stop nature of batch processing, maintaining constant reaction conditions and material throughput, which simultaneously reduces processing time and ensures consistent product quality across all production runs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous process is divided into multiple sequential reaction stages, each performed in a separate continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR). The aggregation process is segmented into nucleation, growth, and coalescence stages, with each stage optimized in its own reactor. This segmentation allows independent control of parameters at each stage while maintaining overall process continuity, improving both efficiency and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If batch processes are used for aggregation and coalescence involving heating of bulk materials, then the materials can be processed, but each process takes many hours to complete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous process maintains constant heating and reaction conditions throughout the aggregation and coalescence stages, eliminating the repeated heating cycles required in batch processes. Materials flow continuously through heated zones, allowing rapid energy transfer and process completion in minutes rather than hours, significantly reducing both processing time and total energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The process utilizes controlled temperature gradients and pH changes as materials flow through the reactor series. Temperature is incrementally increased through successive reactors to drive aggregation and coalescence reactions efficiently. These parameter changes are continuously maintained at optimal values, enabling rapid processing without the energy-intensive heating cycles of batch processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If continuous tubular reactors are used to improve space time yield, then productivity increases, but issues remain with producing toner particles of interest

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace time yieldVSAvoidparticle size and distribution control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces a single continuous tubular reactor with a series of continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTRs), each performing a specific function in the aggregation sequence. This segmentation provides the productivity of continuous processing while enabling precise control of particle formation at each stage through independent stirring and parameter control, achieving both high space-time yield and accurate particle size distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous stirred tank reactors incorporate dynamic stirring mechanisms that maintain uniform suspension and controlled mixing throughout each reaction zone. The stirring speed and intensity can be independently adjusted for each reactor to optimize aggregation kinetics and particle morphology, providing the flexibility needed to produce toner particles with precise size and shape characteristics while maintaining continuous high-rate production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system significantly reduces processing time, enhances batch-to-batch consistency, and improves environmental sustainability by optimizing space-time yield and particle properties, such as size and distribution, while maintaining high-quality toner production.

Implementation Method 1

the reactors are separated from each other by orifice plates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

Each of the reactors is temperature controlled by externally applied cooling or heating devices

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

Fluid is pumped continuously from one reactor to the next

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPumping: Pump

Implementation Method 4

each reactor is associated with an impeller to assist movement of materials through the reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentEP2487544B1Continuous emulsification-aggregation process for the production of particles
Publication Date: 2016.01.20 XEROX CORP
  • EP2487544B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2487544B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2487544B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A continuous emulsion aggregation process for the production of particles is presented including a plurality of continuous stirred-tank reactors (CSTR). The plurality of continuous stirred-tank reactors includes at least one feed tank of raw materials, at least one reactor for facilitating cold addition, at least two reactors for facilitating an aggregation process, at least one reactor for facilitating a shell addition process; at least one reactor for facilitating a freeze process, at least one reactor for facilitating a chelating process, at least one reactor for facilitating a ramp-up process and at least one reactor for facilitating a coalescence process, wherein the reactors are sequentially assembled in a series configuration and separated by short conduits to produce toner particles that are narrowly distributed.