Continuous Enzyme Addition for Fermentation Process Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling the fermentation process in biofuel production plants result in decreased ethanol production, inefficient yeast use, and longer turnaround times due to inadequate control over the fermentation process variables.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for controlling batch fermentation processes in biofuel production plants by continuously adding amylolytic enzymes to fermenters, with the enzyme addition being controlled based on monitored parameters to optimize yeast activity and ethanol production, using a combination of enzyme additive systems and control systems that integrate continuous enzyme addition with batch fermentation processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional batch fermentation control methods are used, then the process is simpler to operate, but ethanol production decreases and yeast use becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveethanol productionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system where process parameters (temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, foam level) are continuously monitored and used to adjust enzyme addition rates. The controller receives signals from sensors and automatically modulates pump speeds to maintain optimal fermentation conditions, resolving the contradiction by using automated feedback to achieve high productivity without manual intervention complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-regulating fermentation control where the controller automatically adjusts enzyme addition based on real-time parameter monitoring without operator intervention. The system serves itself by using sensor data to autonomously optimize fermentation conditions, achieving high ethanol production while simplifying operational complexity through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of time

If traditional fermentation control is used, then fewer resources are required, but turnaround time increases and yeast efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebatch turnaround timeVSAvoidenzyme addition quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic enzyme addition where pump speeds and flow rates are continuously adjusted based on real-time fermentation parameter monitoring. Instead of fixed batch-wise enzyme addition, the system dynamically modulates enzyme delivery to match the instantaneous needs of the fermentation process, reducing turnaround time while optimizing enzyme utilization efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (enzyme addition rate, pump speed, flow rate) in real-time based on monitored fermentation conditions. By dynamically adjusting these parameters rather than using fixed quantities, the system reduces batch turnaround time while maintaining optimal yeast efficiency and enzyme utilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If continuous enzyme addition is implemented, then yeast productivity increases, but the control system becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyeast productivityVSAvoidenzyme additive system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a multi-functional control system that simultaneously monitors multiple parameters (temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, foam level) and controls multiple functions (enzyme addition, aeration, agitation, cooling) through a single integrated controller. This universal approach increases yeast productivity while managing system complexity through consolidation rather than proliferation of separate control devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary between sensor inputs and actuator outputs, translating raw sensor data into coordinated control actions for enzyme addition and other fermentation parameters. This intermediary function manages system complexity by centralizing the decision-making logic while enabling sophisticated multi-parameter optimization that boosts yeast productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances yeast productivity, reduces fermenter fill and batch times, and increases biofuel yield with a substantially unchanged quantity of inputs, leading to improved efficiency and productivity in biofuel production.

Implementation Method 1

yeast ferments glucose released by action of the amylolytic enzyme on the mash

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 2

yeast ferments glucose released by action of the amylolytic enzyme on the mash to produce ethanol

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFermentation: Fermentation

Data Source

PatentUS9593348B2System and method for continuous enzyme addition to a fermentation process
Publication Date: 2017.03.14 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US9593348B2 patent drawing
  • US9593348B2 patent drawing
  • US9593348B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a fermentation process includes injecting a mash into a fermenter and injecting an enzymatic additive into the fermenter on a continuous basis. The enzymatic additive is injected on a continuous basis during at least two time periods: during a batch fill and after the batch fill. The method may be used to control the fermentation processes of one or more fermenters operating in parallel.