Polyurethane Foam Layer Production Through Continuous Staged Curing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing processes for producing polyurethane foams, particularly for medical applications, suffer from low throughput, require batch processing, and are prone to runaway curing reactions, necessitating improved process control and higher production speeds.

Innovation Solution

A continuous process involving mixing, layer formation, transportation, accelerated curing via radiation heating, and separate drying steps to produce polyurethane foam layers, minimizing runaway reactions and enhancing throughput.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If batch processing is used to produce polyurethane foam layers, then runaway curing reactions can be controlled, but throughput is low and production time is long

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidprocess control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous production process is divided into distinct functional zones: mixing zone, layer formation zone, transportation zone, accelerated curing zone, and drying zone. Each zone performs a specific function, allowing the process to maintain continuous operation while controlling the curing reaction through spatial segmentation rather than temporal batch processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The curing process is initiated in advance during the mixing and layer formation steps, and the foam layer is then transported through a controlled environment before entering the accelerated curing zone. This preliminary action allows the reaction to start under controlled conditions and progress to a stage where accelerated curing can be safely applied without runaway reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If room temperature curing is used to avoid runaway reactions, then process control is improved, but curing rate is slow and production speed is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecuring rateVSAvoidrunaway reaction risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The foam layer undergoes preliminary curing at room temperature during mixing and transportation, allowing the reaction to progress to a controlled stage before accelerated curing is applied. This preliminary action reduces the risk of runaway reactions when higher temperatures are later introduced.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The process utilizes changes in temperature parameters along the production line. The foam layer is first processed at room temperature, then transported to an accelerated curing zone where temperature is increased to speed up the curing reaction. This parameter change is applied at the optimal point in the curing process to maximize efficiency while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If higher line speeds are used to increase throughput, then residence time is reduced, but foam layers do not fully cure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveline speedVSAvoidcuring completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The process employs parameter changes along the production line, transitioning from room temperature processing to accelerated curing at higher temperatures. This allows the foam to achieve complete curing even at higher line speeds by increasing the reaction rate in the accelerated curing zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The natural slow curing process at room temperature is replaced by introducing an accelerated curing zone that uses elevated temperature to speed up the reaction. This substitution allows the process to maintain higher line speeds while ensuring complete curing of the foam layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If continuous processing is implemented to increase throughput, then production efficiency is improved, but process control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidprocess control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous processing system is segmented into distinct functional zones (mixing, layer formation, transportation, accelerated curing, drying), with each zone performing a specific function. This segmentation simplifies control by allowing each zone to be optimized and monitored independently while maintaining continuous operation throughout the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves higher throughput and improved process control, reducing cure time by approximately 25% while maintaining foam properties, and minimizing temperature gradients for homogeneous curing.

Implementation Method 1

The zone (30) for accelerated curing is provided with at least three infrared lamps (31)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared radiation: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 2

the exothermic reaction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExothermic reaction: Exothermic Reaction

Data Source

PatentUS12428535B2High throughput manufacture of polyurethane foam layers
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 MOLNLYCKE HEALTH CARE AB
  • US12428535B2 patent drawing
  • US12428535B2 patent drawing
  • US12428535B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is an at least partly continuous process for making polyurethane foam layers that are suitable for medical applications, in particular in wound dressings, at a high throughput rate. The described process includes a step of accelerated curing of the polyurethane foam performed at a stage of the overall curing process at which the risk of a run-away reaction is minimized.