Continuous Immune Context Scoring for Stage III Colorectal Cancer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for assessing immune cell infiltrate in colorectal cancer are not quantitative, relying on binary scoring systems that compromise accuracy and lead to mis-prognosis and missed treatment opportunities.

Innovation Solution

A method using a continuous scoring function, such as a Cox proportional hazard model, to calculate an immune context score (ICS) based on the density of CD3+ cells in tumor tissue sections, allowing for a more accurate assessment of immune cell infiltration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If binary scoring systems (Jass score, Klintrup-Mäkinen grade, Galon IMMUNOSCORE) are used to assess immune cell infiltrate, then the assessment process is simplified and easier to perform, but measurement precision and prognostic accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of immune cell assessmentVSAvoidaccuracy of immune cell quantification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the assessment from discrete binary categories (present/absent, low/high) to continuous quantitative parameters by counting actual immune cell densities per high-power field and calculating standardized scores. This parameter change enables precise measurement while maintaining operational feasibility through automated or semi-automated counting methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual binary scoring with automated image analysis systems that digitally quantify immune cell infiltrate. This substitution uses computer vision and algorithms to objectively count cells and generate continuous scores, eliminating subjectivity and improving measurement precision while reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If continuous scoring function (Cox proportional hazard model) is used to calculate immune context score, then prognostic accuracy and treatment selection precision are improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of prognostic assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of scoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex continuous scoring process into distinct manageable components: (1) immune cell detection and counting in specific tumor regions, (2) calculation of cell densities per high-power field, (3) application of standardized scoring formulas, and (4) integration into prognostic models. This segmentation makes the complex system more manageable and implementable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces standardized intermediate scoring metrics (immune cell density per high-power field, standardized immune score) that serve as mediators between raw cell counts and final prognostic predictions. These intermediaries simplify the computational process and make the system more interpretable while maintaining prognostic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12422435B2Methods and systems for evaluation of immune cell infiltrate in stage III colorectal cancer
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC
  • US12422435B2 patent drawing
  • US12422435B2 patent drawing
  • US12422435B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Immune context scores are calculated for stage III colorectal tumor tissue samples using continuous scoring functions. Feature metrics for at least one immune cell marker are calculated for a region or regions of interest, the feature metrics including at least a density of human CD3+ cells in a region of interest including an invasive margin. A continuous scoring function is then applied to a feature vector, the output of which is an immune context score. The immune context score may then be plotted as a function of a diagnostic or treatment metric, such as a prognostic metric (e.g. overall survival, disease-specific survival, progression-free survival) or a predictive metric (e.g. likelihood of response to a particular treatment course). The immune context score may then be incorporated into diagnostic and/or treatment decisions.