Continuous PET Hydrolysis for High-IV Terephthalic Acid Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for hydrolyzing polyethylene terephthalate (PET) with high polymerization degree (IV ≥ 0.75 dl/g) face challenges such as low reactivity, reactor clogging, and the use of toxic organic solvents, leading to incomplete decomposition and safety hazards.

Innovation Solution

A continuous hydrolysis process using a continuous reactor, where PET is heated and pressurized, mixed with an alkali-metal and ethylene glycol slurry, and reacted without an organic solvent, employing a staged introduction of alkali and weak acid salts to maintain reaction efficiency and purity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If PET with high polymerization degree (IV ≥ 0.75 dl/g) is used, then product quality and mechanical strength are improved, but hydrolysis reactivity decreases and decomposition becomes incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidhydrolysis reactivity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically optimizing reaction conditions including temperature (200-280°C), pressure (0.1-10 MPa), residence time (1-60 minutes), and alkali-metal to PET ratio (1:0.1 to 1:5) to achieve complete hydrolysis of high-polymerization PET while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs preliminary action through pre-mixing alkali-metal with weak acid salts (such as Na2CO3, K2CO3, NaHCO3, KHCO3) before introducing to the reactor, which prepares the catalytic system in advance to immediately activate hydrolysis upon contact with PET, overcoming the low reactivity of high-IV PET

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If conventional hydrolysis methods are used, then some decomposition is achieved, but toxic organic solvents must be used and safety hazards increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecomposition efficiencyVSAvoidtoxic solvent exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the extraction principle by completely removing toxic organic solvents from the hydrolysis system and replacing them with water as the reaction medium, thereby eliminating solvent-related safety hazards while maintaining decomposition efficiency through optimized alkali-metal catalysis and process conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a safe reaction environment by using water as the reaction medium and operating under controlled pressure conditions, effectively creating an inert-like environment that eliminates flammability and toxicity risks associated with organic solvents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

3Productivity

If high-pressure and high-temperature conditions are applied to improve hydrolysis rate, then reaction speed increases, but energy consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrolysis rateVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using moderate pressure (0.1-10 MPa) and temperature (200-280°C) conditions that are sufficient to achieve complete hydrolysis without requiring extreme conditions, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining high hydrolysis rates through effective alkali-metal catalysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs continuous hydrolysis in a reactor system where PET and alkali-metal slurry are continuously fed, reacted, and discharged, maintaining steady-state operation that improves energy efficiency compared to batch processing while ensuring complete decomposition through continuous exposure to optimal reaction conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Productivity

If alkali-metal is added to accelerate hydrolysis, then reaction efficiency improves, but impurity formation and purification difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction efficiencyVSAvoidproduct purity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces weak acid salts (Na2CO3, K2CO3, NaHCO3, KHCO3) as intermediary substances that work synergistically with alkali-metal to catalyze hydrolysis, helping to control the reaction pathway and reduce impurity formation while maintaining high reaction efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the ratio of alkali-metal to PET (1:0.1 to 1:5) and controls reaction parameters to achieve complete hydrolysis with minimal impurity formation, using precise parameter control to balance reaction efficiency and product purity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method achieves high-yield production of terephthalic acid with improved safety and reduced impurities, avoiding the use of toxic solvents and overcoming the limitations of high-polymerization PET.

Implementation Method 1

introducing high polymerization degree polyethylene terephthalate having an intrinsic viscosity of 0.75 dl/g or more into a continuous reactor, and then heating and pressurizing the same to prepare a fluidal polyethylene terephthalate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

implementing neat reaction of the fluidal polyethylene terephthalate with the mixed slurry in the continuous reactor to prepare alkali-metal terephthalate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 3

introducing a mixed slurry prepared by mixing alkali containing an alkali-metal, a weak acid salt of the alkali-metal and ethylene glycol together

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNeutralization reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 4

heating and pressurizing the same to prepare a fluidal polyethylene terephthalate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressurization: Pressurisation

Data Source

PatentUS12473418B2Method of manufacturing for terephthalic acid using polyethylene terephthalate with high degree of polymerization more than 0.75 dl/g of intrinsic viscosity
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 KIM YONG BUM
  • US12473418B2 patent drawing
  • US12473418B2 patent drawing
  • US12473418B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for production of terephthalic acid using high polymerization degree polyethylene terephthalate, which includes: (i) introducing high polymerization degree polyethylene terephthalate having an intrinsic viscosity of 0.75 dl/g or more into a continuous reactor, and then heating and pressurizing the same to prepare a fluidal polyethylene terephthalate; (ii) introducing a mixed slurry prepared by mixing an alkaline material containing an alkali-metal, a weak acid salt of the alkali-metal and ethylene glycol together into an internal position of the continuous reactor, through which the fluidal polyethylene terephthalate passes, and implementing neat reaction of the fluidal polyethylene terephthalate with the mixed slurry in the continuous reactor to prepare alkali-metal terephthalate; and (iii) dissolving the prepared alkali-metal terephthalate in water, removing foreign substances through filtration and centrifugation, adding acid to the alkali-metal terephthalate dissolved in water and reacting the same, thereby producing terephthalic acid.