Continuous-Time Quantum Computing With Hamiltonian Pulse Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quantum computing methods based on the circuit model are resource-inefficient and prone to decoherence, requiring error correction techniques that add significant overhead, and existing optimal control methods do not effectively utilize the native properties of quantum systems for efficient computation.

Innovation Solution

A quantum computing device and method that employs a classical control system to generate semi-classical control fields, encoding an input matrix as an off-diagonal block in the Hamiltonian evolution, using singular value decomposition and alternating effective Hamiltonians to achieve a desired unitary operation with reduced error and increased efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If quantum circuit model with discrete gates is used, then ease of implementation and error correction are improved, but computational time and resource efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs continuous-time quantum evolution governed by a time-dependent Hamiltonian, allowing quantum operations to proceed continuously rather than through discrete gate steps. This continuous evolution enables faster computation while maintaining quantum coherence, directly addressing the time loss issue without sacrificing reliability through the inherent unitary evolution of the quantum system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamically controllable Hamiltonians that can be adjusted in real-time to optimize quantum operations. By making the Hamiltonian time-dependent and adaptable, the system achieves both fast computation and error mitigation through dynamic control, resolving the contradiction between speed and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If discrete quantum gates are applied sequentially, then implementation simplicity is improved, but productivity and computational speed deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidcomputational speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous quantum evolution under a time-dependent Hamiltonian, eliminating the need for sequential discrete gate operations. This continuous approach maintains implementation simplicity through Hamiltonian control while dramatically improving computational speed by avoiding the step-by-step gate application bottleneck

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical sequential gate application model with a continuous quantum mechanical evolution model. By substituting discrete gate operations with continuous Hamiltonian evolution, the system achieves both simplicity in control (through Hamiltonian parameters) and high computational speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If error correction schemes are implemented, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and memory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous-time quantum evolution approach inherently maintains quantum coherence and unitarity throughout the computation, reducing error accumulation that would otherwise require complex correction schemes. This continuous process simplifies the system by minimizing the need for additional error correction infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent leverages the continuous unitary evolution of quantum systems to naturally suppress errors through controlled Hamiltonian dynamics. By converting the quantum mechanical evolution itself into an error-mitigation mechanism, the system reduces complexity while maintaining or improving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Ease of operation

If traditional quantum circuit methods are used, then ease of adoption is improved, but resource efficiency and memory usage deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of adoptionVSAvoidmemory requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the discrete circuit model with continuous quantum mechanical evolution, achieving more efficient use of quantum resources. This substitution maintains ease of operation through Hamiltonian control while reducing memory requirements by eliminating the need for extensive qubit registers needed in discrete gate models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12626173B2Device and method for continuous time quantum computing
Publication Date: 2026.05.12 SECOND FOUNDATION INC
  • US12626173B2 patent drawing
  • US12626173B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to quantum computing methods and devices, wherein a computation corresponding to a certain desired unitary transformation of the Hilbert space of a quantum system, such as a set of qubits, is implemented by selective application of control pulses in order realize a continuous time quantum computation rather than by decomposing the unitary transformation into a sequence of gates taken from a fixed set of gates. In this way an effective Hamiltonian having an input matrix A encoded as an off-diagonal block connecting a first and a second subspace of the quantum system is then applied alternatingly with some standard Hamiltonian in order to obtain a time evolution corresponding to a given function f applied to the input matrix A. The required control pulses are optimized by means of classical compression techniques such as a deep learning neural network, in order to maximize, during the information loading phase of the computation, the amount of classical information loaded into the system, and, during the computational phase, the number of elementary continuous time quantum transformations, respectively.