Continuous Sieving Apparatus for Insect Pupa Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for separating insect pupae, such as manual sorting and batch processes using mesh screens or parallel glass plates, are inefficient and costly, leading to low throughput and yield, particularly in large-scale sterile insect technique (SIT) programs where continuous and high-quantity sorting is required.

Innovation Solution

A continuous sieving apparatus with an inclined sieve surface and actuation system that separates pupae based on size by moving the sieve vertically between two positions within a basin, allowing pupae of specific sizes to pass through elongated openings while larger pupae are diverted into a funnel, utilizing a basin with dividers to manage liquid levels and separate pupae effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual sorting or batch processes using mesh screens are used, then separation can be performed, but throughput and productivity are low

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sieve is made movable rather than stationary, allowing it to be repeatedly submerged in and removed from the liquid containing pupae. This dynamic operation enables continuous processing where the sieve can be lowered to allow pupae passage and raised to drain liquid, significantly increasing throughput compared to static batch processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The sieving process operates continuously rather than in batches. The sieve undergoes repeated cycles of submersion and removal, allowing constant flow of pupae through the system. This continuous operation eliminates idle time between batches and maintains constant separation activity, dramatically improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Productivity

If conventional mesh screens are used, then pupae separation is possible, but entanglement occurs and yield decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveyieldVSAvoidentanglement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The openings in the sieve are specifically shaped as elongated slots with dimensions tailored to the cephalothorax width of the pupae. This localized geometric design allows pupae to pass through easily in their natural orientation while preventing entanglement, as the elongated shape guides them through without catching on the edges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The sieve openings are designed with specific dimensional parameters - elongated slots rather than circular or square holes. The length and width of these openings are optimized to match the pupae dimensions, creating a geometric filter that permits passage while minimizing interaction forces that cause entanglement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If batch processing is used, then separation can be performed, but processing time increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous cycling of the sieve between submerged and raised positions enables uninterrupted processing. Unlike batch methods requiring loading, processing, and unloading cycles, this dynamic system maintains constant flow, eliminating idle time and significantly reducing total processing time for large volumes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system operates without interruption, with the sieve continuously alternating between allowing pupae passage (when submerged) and draining liquid (when raised). This unbroken sequence of operations eliminates the start-stop nature of batch processing, maintaining constant productivity and reducing overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus achieves high separation rates and throughput by continuously sorting pupae without the need for batch processing, reducing entanglement and increasing yield, enabling efficient separation of male and female pupae in large quantities.

Implementation Method 1

The actuation system is configured to separate a population of pupae introduced into the interior volume of the inclined sieve based on size by moving the inclined sieving container along a substantially vertical lifting axis between a first position within the basin and a second position within the basin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

a basin sized to receive the inclined sieving container and to retain a liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentUS11691178B2Continuous sieving apparatuses for pupae separation
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 GOOGLE LLC
  • US11691178B2 patent drawing
  • US11691178B2 patent drawing
  • US11691178B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A continuous sieving apparatus is described. The continuous sieving apparatus includes a sieve surface attached to a wall. A set of openings is formed in the sieve surface so as to define a set of pathways extending through the sieve surface. The set of opening are defined by a length dimension that is greater than a width dimension. An action system is configured to move the sieve surface in one or more directions (e.g., horizontally and vertically). Such movement causes a first pupa having a first cephalothorax width that is less than the width dimension to move through any one of the set of openings, and a second pupa having a second cephalothorax width that is greater than the width dimension to be prevented from moving through the set of openings.