Continuous Stirrup Forming for Precise Rebar Cage Spacing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional stirrup manufacturing is labor-intensive and time-consuming, with difficulty in precisely controlling spacing between adjacent stirrups, affecting the structural strength of reinforced concrete structures.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for manufacturing a continuous stirrup using a wave-shaped planar structure with positioning members and an elongated mold to bend the stirrup into a continuous form, ensuring regular spacing and efficient assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional separate stirrups are manually welded or tied to main bars, then stirrup installation can be completed, but the process is labor-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestirrup installation efficiencyVSAvoidtime required for stirrup installation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple separate stirrups are merged into a single continuous stirrup structure that wraps around the main bars continuously. This eliminates the need for manual welding or tying of individual stirrups, significantly reducing labor intensity and installation time while maintaining the structural function of providing shear reinforcement to the concrete beam.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous stirrup is pre-assembled as a complete loop structure before installation. The stirrup body is formed in advance with predetermined spacing for multiple stirrup positions, allowing the entire assembly to be installed as one unit rather than assembling individual components on-site, thereby improving productivity and reducing installation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If separate stirrups are manually positioned, then stirrup installation can be completed, but precise control of spacing between adjacent stirrups is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespacing control between adjacent stirrupsVSAvoiddifficulty of positioning stirrups
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The spacing between adjacent stirrups is predetermined and built into the continuous stirrup structure during manufacturing. Positioning features such as bends, hooks, or spacing elements are pre-formed at specific intervals along the continuous stirrup, ensuring precise spacing control without requiring manual measurement and positioning during installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Positioning members or spacing elements are introduced as intermediary components within the continuous stirrup structure. These intermediaries maintain fixed distances between adjacent stirrup sections, acting as mechanical spacers that ensure precise spacing control while simplifying the positioning operation during installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Strength

If multiple separate stirrups are used, then reinforcement can be provided, but the number of components increases complexity of assembly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural reinforcement strengthVSAvoidnumber of stirrup components
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple discrete stirrup components are merged into a single continuous stirrup structure that provides the same or enhanced reinforcement strength. The continuous structure eliminates the need for multiple separate components, reducing assembly complexity while maintaining the structural function of providing shear reinforcement through a unified, interconnected design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous stirrup is segmented into multiple functional sections that correspond to individual stirrup positions, but these segments are connected in a continuous loop rather than being separate components. This segmentation allows the structure to provide reinforcement at multiple locations while maintaining a single integrated component, reducing assembly complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces manpower and time required for stirrup installation while maintaining precise spacing, enhancing the structural strength of rebar cages.

Implementation Method 1

impelling the elongated mold to abut against the first lateral region so that the first lateral region is bent upward relative to the platform to form an intermediate structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

impelling the elongated mold to abut against the second lateral region so that the second lateral region is bent upward relative to the platform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS11819897B2Apparatus and method for manufacturing continuous stirrup
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 RUNHORN PRETECH ENG CO LTD
  • US11819897B2 patent drawing
  • US11819897B2 patent drawing
  • US11819897B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for manufacturing a continuous stirrup and an apparatus for implementing such method are provided. The method includes placing a planar structure formed of a wave-shaped rebar on a platform, fixing a side of the planar structure and using an elongated mold to abut against the other side of the planar structure to form an intermediate structure, flipping the intermediate structure, and abutting the elongated mold against the side of the planar structure to form a continuous stirrup.