Continuous Thermal Decomposition of Carbonaceous Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for thermal decomposition of carbonaceous materials in power engineering are inefficient due to non-continuous processing, energy losses, and inability to produce stable and usable combustible gases, leading to environmental contamination and suboptimal fuel production.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a mobile pressure vessel with controlled preheating and afterheating stages, where gases are drawn off and processed to create a stable gas mixture for fuel production, allowing continuous operation and minimizing energy losses by maintaining a consistent temperature and pressure, and utilizing a liquid heat carrier for efficient heating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If batch processing with cooling down between charges is used, then equipment can be simple and easy to operate, but productivity is low and energy losses are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing continuityVSAvoidenergy loss during cooling
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The heated space is divided into multiple independent chambers that can be operated simultaneously or in sequence. While one chamber is being cooled down after a batch, another chamber can be loaded with fresh material and heated, enabling continuous processing without complete system shutdown

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The heated space is preheated before material is introduced, and the material is pre-dried or pre-processed to optimal moisture content and particle size before charging. This eliminates the need for extended cooling periods and reduces energy loss by maintaining optimal temperatures throughout the process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If extended heating time is used to ensure complete decomposition, then decomposition completeness is improved, but productivity decreases and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecomposition completenessVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The heating process uses variable temperature profiles with different stages: an initial high-temperature phase for rapid volatile decomposition, followed by a controlled lower-temperature phase for complete carbonization. This optimized temperature-time profile achieves complete decomposition faster than uniform low-temperature heating

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The heating process operates continuously without interruption or cooling cycles between batches. Material is constantly fed into the heated space, decomposition products are continuously removed, and the thermal field is maintained at optimal decomposition temperatures throughout operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If high temperature heating is used to accelerate decomposition, then processing speed increases, but energy consumption increases and decomposition control becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecomposition rateVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The heating process employs periodic temperature variations with distinct phases: rapid heating to decomposition temperature, maintained heating for active decomposition, and controlled cooling for product stabilization. This periodic thermal regimen achieves high decomposition rates while minimizing total energy input compared to sustained high-temperature heating

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The decomposition process is made self-sustaining by utilizing the heat generated from the exothermic decomposition reactions themselves. Once initiated, the decomposition of carbonaceous material releases enough heat to maintain the decomposition temperature without continuous external energy input, dramatically reducing energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If natural cooling is used after heating, then equipment complexity is reduced, but processing time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling system complexityVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling function is extracted as a separate, independent system that operates in parallel with the heating system. While one chamber undergoes active cooling through dedicated cooling channels, another chamber can be loaded and heated, eliminating the need for sequential cooling and reducing overall cycle time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the efficient production of solid, liquid, and gaseous fuels from carbonaceous materials with minimal environmental impact, allowing for continuous operation and reducing energy losses, while ensuring the stability and purity of the produced gas for use in cogeneration units.

Implementation Method 1

heating the pressure vessel (1) in an appropriately heated space

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

carbonaceous material is processed by means of thermal decomposition without the presence of flame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Thermolysis

Implementation Method 3

Classic pyrolysis and other methods are involved

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 4

Gases discharged from the heated space are led through a heat exchanger or cooler, where they are subjected to cooling, which results in separation of water, if there is any, and oily condensate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentUS9988578B2Method of fuel for energetics production
Publication Date: 2018.06.05 HEDVIGA GRP
  • US9988578B2 patent drawing
  • US9988578B2 patent drawing
  • US9988578B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Pressure vessels containing a charge are preheated at pressure of 2 to 5 kPa with liquid heat carrier to maximally 120° C. They are afterheated in another place to maximally 550° C. The pressure vessels are continually added and/or replaced and generated gasses are continuously drawn off, cooled to maximally 60° C. and separated oily condensate. Residual gasses and solid residues are burned after treatment in a cogeneration unit.