Trailing Edge Contour Surfaces for Vortex Mixing and Drag Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for wake vortex control and drag alleviation do not effectively eliminate concentrated trailing wake vortices, leading to increased induced drag and aerodynamic noise, which limits aircraft separation distances and overall flight efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The integration of contour surfaces with riblets and compliant materials along the trailing edge of lifting or thrust-generating bodies, promoting vortex-mixing by varying the time and position of fluid stream mixing across the span, reduces the size and duration of wake vortices, thereby decreasing drag and noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional wake vortex control methods (wingtip devices, control surface oscillations) are used, then induced drag is reduced, but concentrated trailing wake vortices are not eliminated and aerodynamic noise remains high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinduced dragVSAvoidconcentrated trailing wake vortices and aerodynamic noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the trailing edge into multiple spanwise sections, each with independently controllable effectors that generate distributed vortex structures. This breaks up the single concentrated wake vortex into multiple smaller vortices distributed across the span, reducing the harmful concentration of kinetic energy while maintaining drag reduction benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces spanwise vortex generators and trailing edge effectors as intermediary structures that actively manipulate the flow between the wing body and the wake. These intermediaries generate controlled vortex structures that promote mixing and dissipate the concentrated wake energy before it forms into harmful large-scale vortices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If wake vortex mitigation is not implemented, then aircraft separation distances can be reduced, but concentrated wake vortices increase aerodynamic noise and reduce flight efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft separation distanceVSAvoidaerodynamic noise and wake vortex intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts the harmful concentrated wake vortex kinetic energy into beneficial distributed mixing flows. By using spanwise vortex generators and trailing edge effectors, the kinetic energy that would otherwise form harmful concentrated vortices is redirected to create distributed vortex structures that enhance mixing and accelerate wake dissipation, allowing shorter separation distances without increasing noise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional trailing edge designs are used, then manufacturing is simple, but vortex mixing is forced to occur only at wing tips reducing effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrailing edge structureVSAvoidvortex mixing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The trailing edge is segmented into multiple spanwise sections with distributed vortex generators and effectors. This segmentation allows vortex mixing to occur at multiple locations along the span rather than being forced only at the wing tips, significantly improving mixing efficiency while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through modular implementation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the trailing edge are equipped with locally optimized vortex generators and effectors tailored to the specific flow conditions at each spanwise location. This local quality approach ensures optimal vortex mixing efficiency at each section while maintaining overall system simplicity and manufacturability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces induced drag and vortex-induced noise, allowing for closer aircraft separation, increased flight efficiency, and reduced wear on control surfaces, while enhancing fuel efficiency and safety.

Implementation Method 1

promoting vortex-mixing by varying the time and position of fluid stream mixing across the span, reduces the size and duration of wake vortices

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex-mixing: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS20220055739A1Method and apparatus for mitigating trailing vortex wakes of lifting or thrust generating bodies
Publication Date: 2022.02.24 DELOS AEROSPACE LLC
  • US20220055739A1 patent drawing
  • US20220055739A1 patent drawing
  • US20220055739A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods and apparatuses for mitigating the formation of concentrated wake vortex structures generated from lifting or thrust-generating bodies and maneuvering control surfaces wherein the use of contour surface geometries promotes vortex-mixing of high and low flow fluids. The methods and apparatuses can be combined with various drag reduction techniques, such as the use of riblets of various types and/or compliant surfaces (passive and active). Such combinations form unique structures for various fluid dynamic control applications to suppress transiently growing forms of boundary layer disturbances in a manner that significantly improves performance and has improved control dynamics.