Contoured Body Armor Subassemblies for Female Wearers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing body armor technologies for female wearers face challenges in providing flexible, contoured protection without compromising ballistic performance, as they often rely on darts, pleats, or bonding that can affect mobility and stability during impact.

Innovation Solution

A method and article comprising discrete nonwoven subassemblies with offset yarn orientations, a binding layer, and a matrix resin, molded without darts or pleats, allowing each subassembly to move freely within the stack, enhancing flexibility and stability while maintaining ballistic protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If darts, pleats, or bonding are used to shape body armor for female wearers, then the armor can be contoured to fit body shapes, but the mobility and stability during impact are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontoured shapeVSAvoidmobility
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The body armor is divided into multiple discrete subassemblies, each independently contoured to fit specific body contours. These subassemblies are stacked and held together by a minimal binding structure rather than being permanently bonded, allowing individual movement while maintaining overall shape. This segmentation enables the armor to conform to body shapes without sacrificing mobility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The binding layer uses a flexible, elastic material that allows dynamic movement of subassemblies relative to each other during impact and motion. The binding structure is designed to be compliant rather than rigid, enabling the subassemblies to move freely while maintaining their contoured positions on the body.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Shape

If darts, pleats, or bonding are used to shape body armor, then the armor can be contoured to fit body shapes, but the stability during impact is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontoured shapeVSAvoidstability during impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the armor into discrete subassemblies held by a flexible binding rather than permanent bonds, each subassembly can independently absorb and distribute impact forces. This segmentation prevents stress concentration at dart or pleat locations while maintaining stability through the distributed binding structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The binding layer uses an elastic material that combines flexibility with impact resistance. This composite approach - combining contoured subassemblies with an elastic binding layer - maintains stability during impact while allowing the contoured shape to be preserved without rigid structural elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of operation

If discrete subassemblies are stacked without bonding to allow free movement, then flexibility and stability are improved, but the structural integrity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The elastic binding layer provides dynamic structural integrity that adapts to movement and impact. Rather than rigid bonding that would compromise flexibility, the elastic material maintains structural coherence while allowing subassemblies to move freely, preserving both flexibility and integrity simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The binding layer functions as a flexible film that holds the discrete subassemblies together without rigid bonding. This thin elastic film maintains structural integrity through its elastic properties while allowing the subassemblies to move independently, preventing delamination while preserving flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides improved flexibility and stability during ballistic impacts, maintaining high areal density and ballistic performance without the need for darts or pleats, and ensuring that each subassembly can move freely within the article.

Implementation Method 1

molding process that is conducted without the concurrent use of a resin... molding the sheet at a temperature of from 100 to 175 degrees C and a pressure of from 0.3 to 100 bar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal softening: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 2

molding the sheet at a temperature of from 100 to 175 degrees C and a pressure of from 0.3 to 100 bar for between 0.5 to 15 minutes to form a subassembly contoured to the shape of a female breast

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical compression: Compression

Implementation Method 3

coating resin, the coating resin being a matrix resin coating the yarns

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentEP2524191B1Shaped body armor and method of making
Publication Date: 2015.09.09 EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO

AI summary

This invention pertains to an article for use in body armor, comprising a plurality of discrete sheet subassemblies contoured to the shape of a female breast arranged in a stack, without bonding, such that the breast contours are positioned on top of each other, each of the subassemblies comprising at least two nonwoven layers of high tenacity yarns such as par-aramid, a binder and a resin.