Contoured Class Divider for Aircraft Cabin Space Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft cabin divider designs fail to optimize space between cabin classes while ensuring passenger safety during rapid deceleration events, as they often require minimum spacing between components to share loads, which limits seat pitch and legroom.

Innovation Solution

A contoured class divider that nests into the volume behind the seat body, featuring a locking mechanism to move forward during deceleration and energy-absorbing zones to mitigate head impacts, allowing for closer placement to seats and increased space without compromising safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a hard divider is placed between rows of seats to separate cabin classes, then class division is achieved, but the minimum spacing requirement of one inch between components limits seat pitch and reduces passenger legroom

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-sharing capabilityVSAvoidseat pitch
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The divider is designed with a locking mechanism that allows it to transition between a fixed position (during normal operation) and a movable position (during rapid deceleration). This dynamic capability enables the divider to be placed closer to seats while still meeting safety requirements, as it can move forward during emergencies to maintain the required one-inch spacing and load-sharing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism is designed to preemptively respond to rapid deceleration forces by allowing the divider to move forward before full impact occurs. This preliminary action prevents the divider from becoming a hazard during emergency landings while enabling closer spacing during normal operation, thus resolving the contradiction between safety requirements and space optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Length of moving object

If the divider is placed closer to seats to increase legroom, then seat pitch is improved, but the ability to share loads during emergency landing conditions is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat pitchVSAvoidload-sharing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The divider transitions from a static structure to a dynamic one with a locking mechanism that engages during normal operation to allow close spacing, and disengages during rapid deceleration to allow forward movement. This maintains load-sharing capability when needed while enabling closer spacing during cruise, resolving the contradiction between strength and length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Volume of stationary object

If the divider is made contoured to nest into the volume behind the seat body, then space optimization is achieved, but the complexity of the divider design increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveusable spaceVSAvoiddivider design
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The divider employs a contoured shape that follows the curvature of the seat backrest, allowing it to nest into the volume behind the seat body. This curved design optimizes space utilization while maintaining structural integrity and compatibility with the seat geometry, resolving the contradiction between volume optimization and design complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Reliability

If a locking mechanism is added to allow the partition to move forward during deceleration, then passenger safety is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safetyVSAvoidlocking mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is designed to automatically respond to rapid deceleration forces without requiring external control or complex actuation systems. The mechanism uses the inertial forces generated during emergency landing to trigger the forward movement of the divider, eliminating the need for sensors, motors, or complex control logic, thus resolving the contradiction between safety improvement and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The contoured class divider increases seat pitch and legroom by allowing seats to be positioned closer together while ensuring compliance with Head Injury Criteria and load-sharing requirements, providing enhanced safety during emergency landings.

Implementation Method 1

an energy absorbing zone includes one or more structurally weakened portions designed to deform or break as a result of a threshold dynamic load

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption through deformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

The energy absorbing zone is designed to deform in a predetermined manner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption through material damping: Damping

Implementation Method 3

a shear pin which remains in its locked position until it is subjected to longitudinal acceleration associated with an emergency landing. Under those conditions the deceleration force experienced by the divider is sufficient to overcome the pin static shear force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear force resistance: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentUS10676194B2Contoured class divider
Publication Date: 2020.06.09 BE AEROSPACE INC
  • US10676194B2 patent drawing
  • US10676194B2 patent drawing
  • US10676194B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a preferred embodiment, a contoured class divider for dividing an aircraft cabin includes a panel positioned between an aft seat and a forward seat, the panel having an aft-facing convex contour closely matching an aft-facing contour of a seatback of the forward seat and configured to enhance space utilization. The contoured class divider may include an articulation system to articulate at least a portion of the panel from a first position (normal operation) to a second position (emergency landing). The contoured class divider may provide up to an additional 12 inches of space which can be used to reduce seat pitch (and thereby enhance passenger comfort) or increase the number of rows of seats on a given aircraft.