Contoured Knit Arm Sleeve With Cut Resistance and Elbow Compression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing protective sleeves lack enhanced cut protection, ergonomic design, and elastic/compression zones, limiting their effectiveness for workers at risk of impacts and cuts.

Innovation Solution

The sleeves are designed with a contoured tubular body formed of cut-resistant and elastic yarns, featuring a hinge shape, multiple mesh density zones, padded elbow portions, and a compression profile to enhance ergonomics and mobility, while incorporating embroidery for improved cut resistance and heat resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If sleeves are made on flat knitting machines with basic protective material, then manufacturing is simple and cost-effective, but cut resistance and ergonomic performance are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut resistanceVSAvoidknitting machine complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sleeve is divided into multiple mesh density zones (first zone with higher mesh density, second zone with lower mesh density) to provide different levels of cut protection in different areas. This segmentation allows the sleeve to achieve enhanced cut resistance where needed while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standardized zone patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sleeve incorporates localized ergonomic features including a hinge shape at the elbow region, compression zones at specific locations, and varied mesh densities in different areas. These local quality modifications enhance comfort and mobility without requiring complete redesign of the entire sleeve structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If sleeves are made with uniform mesh density, then manufacturing is simple, but cut protection efficiency and ergonomic fit are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut protection efficiencyVSAvoidmesh density zones
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sleeve incorporates localized ergonomic features including a hinge shape at the elbow region, compression zones at specific locations, and varied mesh densities in different areas. These local quality modifications enhance comfort and mobility without requiring complete redesign of the entire sleeve structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The sleeve is divided into multiple mesh density zones (first zone with higher mesh density, second zone with lower mesh density) to provide different levels of cut protection in different areas. This segmentation allows the sleeve to achieve enhanced cut resistance where needed while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standardized zone patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If sleeves lack elastic yarns and compression zones, then material selection is simple, but mobility and ergonomic fit are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemobilityVSAvoidyarn composition
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sleeve incorporates elastic yarns blended with cut-resistant yarns to create compression zones with specific compression levels. This parameter change in material composition enables the sleeve to provide both protection and enhanced mobility through controlled compression forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge shape design allows the sleeve to dynamically adapt to elbow movement, providing flexibility and range of motion while maintaining protective coverage. The dynamic geometry accommodates arm movement without compromising protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Strength

If sleeves are designed without hinge shape or padded portions, then manufacturing is simpler, but ergonomic fit and impact protection are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidsleeve geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sleeve incorporates padded portions at the elbow region formed by embroidering additional yarns, providing impact protection before impact occurs. This beforehand cushioning protects the elbow joint from impacts during work activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge shape design allows the sleeve to dynamically adapt to elbow movement, providing flexibility and range of motion while maintaining protective coverage. The dynamic geometry accommodates arm movement without compromising protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The sleeves provide increased cut resistance by 30-45% and reduced impact force by 15-18%, with enhanced ergonomic fit and mobility, meeting EN388:2016 and EN407:2004 standards for cut and heat protection.

Implementation Method 1

the tubular body formed of a cut-resistant yarn and an elastic yarn

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the sleeve has a padded elbow portion formed by embroidering one or more further yarns onto the sleeve portion such that impact force to a user's elbow is reduced by about 15% or more

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact Force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS12495846B2Protective knit sleeves
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 ANSELL LTD
  • US12495846B2 patent drawing
  • US12495846B2 patent drawing
  • US12495846B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a knitted protective cut-resistant compressive sleeve configured to protect a human arm, comprising: a contoured tubular body having a length and two ends with openings at both ends, the tubular body formed of a cut-resistant yarn and an elastic yarn, and providing ergonomic or safety improvements.