Contra-Rotating Electric Helicopter for Low-Noise Hover Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft designs are mechanically complex, expensive, and inefficient in hovering due to high disk loading, limiting their flight time and noise levels, which are critical issues for applications beyond urban air mobility.

Innovation Solution

A contra-rotating electric helicopter design with a simple and reliable architecture, where the electric motor and power source rotate with the first rotor, and a second rotor spins in contra-rotation, eliminating the need for a tail rotor and reducing disk loading, thus achieving lower noise and longer flight times using existing battery technology.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional eVTOL aircraft designs are used, then high-speed forward flight capability is achieved, but hovering efficiency is poor and flight time is limited due to high disk loading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforward flight speedVSAvoidflight time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft is divided into multiple independent rotor systems (first rotor system and second rotor system) that can operate independently. This segmentation allows optimization of each rotor system for specific flight phases, with the first rotor system optimized for hovering and the second for forward flight, thereby improving overall hovering efficiency and extending flight time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rotor systems are designed to be dynamically adjustable, with variable pitch angles and rotational speeds. The first rotor system can adjust its pitch angle to optimize hovering performance, while the second rotor system can be adjusted for forward flight, allowing the aircraft to adapt to different flight conditions and extend operational duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If conventional eVTOL aircraft designs are used, then high-speed forward flight capability is achieved, but mechanical complexity and manufacturing cost are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforward flight speedVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the complex mechanical transmission systems, swashplates, and linkages found in conventional eVTOL designs. By using direct-drive electric motors for each rotor system, the design removes unnecessary mechanical components, thereby reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining forward flight capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional mechanical control systems (swashplates, linkages, gears) are replaced with electrically controlled systems. Each rotor system is driven by independent electric motors with electronic control, substituting complex mechanical transmissions with simpler electrical actuation, thus reducing mechanical complexity and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Speed

If conventional eVTOL aircraft designs are used, then forward flight capability is achieved, but noise levels are high due to high disk loading and rotor speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforward flight speedVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft uses multiple rotor systems instead of a single high-speed rotor system. By distributing the total thrust across several rotors operating at lower individual speeds, the design reduces noise generation while maintaining forward flight capability. The segmented rotor configuration lowers disk loading per rotor, thereby reducing noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the operational parameters of the rotor systems, specifically operating at lower rotational speeds with larger rotor diameters. This parameter change reduces the noise generated by rotor rotation while maintaining the necessary lift and forward flight performance, thereby reducing harmful noise effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Speed

If conventional eVTOL aircraft designs are used, then forward flight capability is achieved, but operating cost is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforward flight speedVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Complex mechanical systems are replaced with electrically driven rotor systems. Each rotor is powered by independent electric motors, eliminating the need for complex mechanical transmissions, gearboxes, and linkages. This substitution simplifies manufacturing processes, reduces assembly complexity, and lowers overall manufacturing cost while maintaining forward flight capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The electric motor systems are designed to perform multiple functions: they can operate in hover mode, forward flight mode, and transition between modes. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate mechanical systems for different flight phases, reducing overall system complexity and manufacturing cost while maintaining all required flight capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design results in a mechanically simple, highly reliable, and quiet rotorcraft with extended flight times and reduced noise, suitable for applications requiring longer flight durations and lower noise levels, such as surveillance, photography, and cargo delivery.

Implementation Method 1

a first rotor (1410) coupled to the base of the motor; and a second rotor (1401) coupled to the output shaft of the electric motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

The torque on the motor shaft resulting from aerodynamic drag forces on the second rotor (1401) imposes a torque on the combined body of the first rotor (1410), electric motor (1405) and power source (1420)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque counteraction: Torque

Data Source

PatentUS11840329B1Contra-rotating electric helicopter
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 SIFLY AVIATION INC
  • US11840329B1 patent drawing
  • US11840329B1 patent drawing
  • US11840329B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A contra-rotating electric helicopter utilizes an electric motor having a base and an output shaft and a power source. The helicopter couples the base to a first rotor, thus allowing both the base and the power source to rotate within the frame of reference of the first rotor, while a contra-rotating and coplanar second rotor is coupled to the output shaft of the electric motor.