Automated Contract Deviation Detection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manual processes for identifying deviations from corporate policies in business documents are subjective, error-prone, and lack uniformity, posing risks to enterprises by potentially exposing them to legal and financial liabilities due to non-standard contract terms.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that provides business document templates with associated deviation rules, automatically identifies non-conforming terms, and generates reports detailing deviations, ensuring compliance with corporate policies before document execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual processes are used to identify deviations from corporate policies in business documents, then employees can review and identify non-compliant terms, but the process becomes subjective, error-prone, and lacks uniformity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of deviation identificationVSAvoidautomation of policy compliance evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical review process with an automated computer-based system that uses software to analyze business documents against stored corporate policies. The system automatically identifies deviations by comparing document terms with policy requirements, eliminating subjective human judgment and ensuring consistent, objective evaluation across all documents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the computer to autonomously perform the compliance evaluation without requiring employee intervention. The automated process independently retrieves policies, analyzes documents, identifies deviations, and generates reports, freeing employees from manual review tasks while maintaining uniformity and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual review processes are used, then employees can evaluate business documents, but the process is very error prone and results in documents being signed without fully understanding risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of compliance assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of compliance evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces error-prone manual evaluation with an automated computer-based system that consistently applies policy rules without fatigue or distraction. The system reliably identifies all deviations by systematically comparing document terms against stored policies, ensuring that no compliance issues are missed before documents are signed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback by generating detailed reports that clearly identify specific deviations from corporate policies. These reports highlight non-compliant terms and reference the relevant policy requirements, enabling employees to understand the risks and make informed decisions about document approval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If manual processes are used to identify policy deviations, then employees must be well trained in corporate policies, but the process remains subjective and not uniformly applied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of policy compliance checkingVSAvoiduniformity of deviation identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically retrieving stored corporate policies and applying them to business documents without requiring employee training or interpretation. The computer-based system uniformly applies the same policy criteria to every document, ensuring consistent results regardless of who operates the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-storing corporate policies in a database before the compliance check begins. This preliminary preparation allows the system to quickly and uniformly apply established policies during the actual document review, eliminating the need for employees to memorize or interpret policy details.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If non-standard contract terms are allowed, then business flexibility is maintained, but the enterprise is exposed to legal and financial liabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in contract negotiationVSAvoidlegal and financial risk exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback by generating reports that clearly identify non-standard terms that deviate from corporate policies. This feedback mechanism allows employees to negotiate flexibly while being aware of potential risks, enabling them to make informed decisions about whether to proceed with non-compliant terms or seek approvals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by proactively identifying and flagging potentially harmful non-standard terms before the contract is finalized. This early detection prevents the enterprise from inadvertently accepting risky terms, allowing time to correct issues or obtain necessary approvals before legal binding occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS8037004B2Computer-implemented methods and systems for identifying and reporting deviations from standards and policies for contracts, agreements and other business documents
Publication Date: 2011.10.11 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US8037004B2 patent drawing
  • US8037004B2 patent drawing
  • US8037004B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method may include steps of providing a plurality of business document templates; providing a plurality of deviation rules and associating at least some of the plurality of deviation rules with each of the business document templates; storing the plurality of business document templates and the associated plurality of deviation rules; generating a business document (such as a contract, for example) based upon one of the stored plurality of business document templates, the generated business document including a plurality of clauses and business document terms; retrieving the plurality of deviation rules associated with the business document template upon which the business document is based and applying the retrieved plurality of deviation rules against the generated business document; identifying all business document terms of the business document that do not conform to one or more of the applied plurality of deviation rules, and generating a report that includes at least the identified non-conforming business document terms.