Contractor Quality Score for Credit Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for establishing and adjusting credit offers for contractors in construction projects are suboptimal as they fail to accurately assess the repayment risk related to general contractors and property owners, and do not adequately utilize lien data, leading to inefficient credit evaluations.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that analyzes contractor information, including financial and business data, to generate a quality score, which is then used to adjust credit offers, incorporating lien data and information about connected general contractors and property owners, employing machine learning models for improved accuracy and flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional uniform credit offers are provided to all contractors, then the credit evaluation process is simple and quick, but the accuracy of risk assessment is low and repayment risk cannot be properly evaluated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment accuracyVSAvoidcredit evaluation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the credit evaluation process by creating a contractor quality score that divides contractors into different quality tiers (e.g., prime contractors, licensed contractors, unlicensed contractors). This segmentation allows the system to apply different credit offer adjustments based on the contractor's quality level, thereby improving risk assessment accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through structured categorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of credit offer by introducing a quality score-based adjustment mechanism. Instead of providing uniform credit offers, the system modifies credit terms (such as credit limits, interest rates, or payment terms) based on the contractor's quality score, which is derived from multiple parameters including lien data, financial information, and project performance. This parameter change enables differentiated risk assessment while maintaining systematic evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If comprehensive contractor analysis including lien data and connected entities is performed, then credit offer accuracy is improved, but the processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecredit offer reliabilityVSAvoidcredit offer generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing contractor quality scores based on comprehensive analysis of lien data, financial information, and connected entities (general contractors and property owners). This pre-computation allows the system to quickly retrieve and apply pre-determined quality scores when generating credit offers, thereby maintaining high reliability through thorough analysis while reducing processing time through cached results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary contractor quality score that mediates between comprehensive contractor analysis and credit offer generation. This quality score acts as an intermediate representation that captures complex relationships (lien data, financial health, project performance) in a single metric, allowing the credit offer system to rely on this pre-synthesized information rather than re-analyzing all underlying data, thus balancing reliability and processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If lien data and information about general contractors and property owners are incorporated, then the ability to assess repayment risk is improved, but the data processing requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepayment risk assessment precisionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple data sources (lien data, financial information, project performance data, and information about connected entities such as general contractors and property owners) into a single contractor quality score. This consolidation combines diverse data elements into a unified metric that comprehensively reflects repayment risk, improving assessment precision while simplifying the credit decision-making process by providing a single integrated quality indicator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal contractor quality score that serves multiple functions: it assesses repayment risk, determines credit offer terms, and can be applied across different construction projects and contractor types. This multi-functional quality score consolidates the analysis of lien data, financial health, and connected entities into a single versatile metric that improves risk assessment precision while reducing the need for separate evaluation systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230214917A1Systems and methods of contractor analysis for credit adjustment
Publication Date: 2023.07.06 BILLD LLC
  • US20230214917A1 patent drawing
  • US20230214917A1 patent drawing
  • US20230214917A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are systems and methods for contractor analysis. A system receives contractor information associated with a contractor. The contractor information includes financial information about the contractor and business information about the contractor. The system generates a contractor quality score based on the contractor information. The system establishes an account credit offer based on the contractor information, and adjusts the account credit offer based on the contractor quality score.