Aircraft Contrail Optical Depth Control via Engine Fuel Mode Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for controlling aircraft contrails are limited in their ability to either increase or decrease their optical depth effectively, which affects their climate-cooling or warming impact, and existing technologies do not provide sufficient flexibility to adapt to varying atmospheric conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method involving lean-burn gas turbine engines, where fuel flow is adjusted to change engine operation modes between pilot-plus-mains and pilot-only modes, allowing for the enhancement or reduction of contrail optical depth based on atmospheric conditions, including relative humidity and temperature, while maintaining constant thrust and aircraft velocity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If fuel flow is reduced to switch from pilot-plus-mains mode to pilot-only mode, then soot particle emissions increase and contrail optical depth increases, but thrust decreases requiring compensation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrail optical depthVSAvoidengine thrust
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The engine fuel system is segmented into pilot fuel injection and main fuel injection components. By selectively controlling the main fuel injection while maintaining pilot fuel injection, the system can operate in pilot-only mode to increase soot emissions and contrail optical depth, while the thrust deficit is compensated by adjusting other engines or flight parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The operating parameters of the engine are changed by adjusting fuel flow rates to transition between pilot-plus-mains mode and pilot-only mode. This parameter change increases soot particle emissions and contrail optical depth, while the resulting thrust change is compensated through coordinated control of multiple engines or flight condition adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If fuel flow is increased to switch from pilot-only mode to pilot-plus-mains mode, then soot particle emissions decrease and contrail optical depth decreases, but thrust increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrail optical depthVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel injection system is divided into pilot and main components, allowing selective operation. By switching from pilot-only to pilot-plus-mains mode, the main fuel injection is activated to reduce soot emissions and contrail optical depth, while the increased fuel consumption is managed through overall engine efficiency optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The engine operating parameters are changed by adjusting fuel flow rates to transition between operational modes. Increasing fuel flow to pilot-plus-mains mode reduces soot emissions and contrail optical depth, while the energy consumption increase is balanced through coordinated control of multiple engines or flight condition optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If thrust distribution is adjusted to compensate for fuel flow changes, then contrail optical depth control is achieved, but engine operating efficiency varies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrail optical depthVSAvoidengine operating efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple engine control strategies are merged into a coordinated system. When one engine operates in pilot-only mode to increase contrail optical depth, other engines adjust their thrust to compensate, maintaining overall aircraft performance while optimizing the contrail effect through combined engine operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The engine control system is made dynamic by allowing real-time adjustment of fuel flow rates and thrust distribution. This enables the system to optimize both contrail optical depth and engine operating efficiency by continuously adapting engine parameters based on atmospheric conditions and flight requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables flexible control of contrail optical depth, optimizing its climate impact by adjusting soot particle emissions in response to ambient conditions, thereby enhancing or reducing the aircraft's climate-cooling or warming effect as needed.

Implementation Method 1

Contrail ice particles entrained in a wingtip vortex are subject to adiabatic heating due to descent of the vortex

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdiabatic heating: Adiabatic Heating

Implementation Method 2

ice mass can be lost from the surface of the entrained ice particles via sublimation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSublimation: Sublimation

Implementation Method 3

lean-burn gas turbine engines each operating in pilot-plus-mains mode with a given initial fuel flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentEP4033082B1Method of controlling aircraft vapour trails and propulsion system providing for control of aircraft vapour trails
Publication Date: 2023.11.01 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • EP4033082B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4033082B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4033082B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

In an aircraft comprising a set of lean-burn gas turbine engines each operating in pilot-plus-mains mode with a given initial fuel flow Wo, a method of controlling the optical depth of contrails produced by a first group of the engines comprises the steps of (i) reducing fuel flow to each engine in the first group to change the operation of each engine in the first group from pilot-plus-mains mode to pilot-only mode, and (ii) adjusting fuel flow to one or more engines in a second group of the engines such that the total fuel flow to engines of the second group is increased, all engines of the second group remaining in pilot-plus-mains mode, and wherein the set of lean-burn engines consists of the first and second groups. Depending on atmospheric conditions, the average optical depth of contrails produced by the engines may be enhanced or reduced compared to the case where all engines operate in pilot-plus-mains mode with a fuel flow W0.