Contralateral Image Orthopedic Implant Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional orthopedic implants often deviate in size and shape from the natural bones they replace, leading to suboptimal fit and function, particularly in complex skeletal structures like the wrist, which can result in incomplete restoration of mobility and dexterity.

Innovation Solution

A method employing contralateral imaging and 3D printing to create patient-specific prosthetic implants by scanning the healthy side of the skeletal structure, inverting and augmenting the 3D model to accurately replicate the compromised bone, using biocompatible materials for precise fabrication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional mass-produced orthopedic implants are used, then manufacturing cost and inventory management are simplified, but the fit and function deviate from natural bone structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefit accuracyVSAvoidcustomization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital 3D model by copying and mirroring the healthy contralateral bone structure. This digital copy serves as the template for designing the custom implant, ensuring it precisely replicates the patient's natural anatomy while eliminating the need for complex manual measurements and modeling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by capturing pre-operative imaging data of the healthy bone and creating a digital 3D model before surgery. This allows the custom implant to be designed and manufactured in advance with precise anatomical matching, rather than attempting to fit standardized implants during surgery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If standardized implants are used, then manufacturing and inventory processes are simplified, but mobility restoration is incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobility restorationVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the key parameter from standardized dimensions to patient-specific anatomical parameters by using contralateral bone imaging data. This allows the implant to precisely match the unique geometry of the patient's bone structure, restoring natural mobility patterns that standardized implants cannot achieve

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If custom patient-specific implants are created through traditional methods, then fit accuracy improves, but manufacturing time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanatomical matchingVSAvoidrecovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical measurement and modeling methods with digital imaging and computational modeling. CT or MRI scans automatically generate 3D models through image processing algorithms, eliminating time-consuming manual measurements and physical model creation while maintaining high anatomical precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11804305B2Contralateral image orthopedic implant
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 MOSAIC VENTURES LLC
  • US11804305B2 patent drawing
  • US11804305B2 patent drawing
  • US11804305B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fabrication system and method for prosthetic appliances employs imaging of a contralateral skeletal structure for designing a matched, patient specific replacement appliance based on the patient's own skeletal structure. Many skeletal structures are disposed on opposed sides, i.e. left and right sides. A contralateral bone or skeletal member often accurately depicts the individual bone shape of a particular patient more accurately than a generalized approximation. A scan such as a CT or MRI is segmented to apportion a skeletal member for replacement and reconstructed into a 3D (3 dimensional) model. The 3D model is inverted to define the contralateral side, and augmented for surgical connection features and comparison with an anatomic ideal to mitigate imperfections. 3D printing and/or additive manufacturing techniques are invoked with biocompatible materials to render the replacement prosthetic appliance based on the model.