Contrast Ultrasound Frame Selection Using Parametric Maps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging techniques require manual frame selection, which is time-consuming and prone to human error, leading to inconsistent and reduced diagnostic value due to incomplete tissue suppression and residual tissue signals.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that analyze grayscale envelope statistical distributions within multi-pixel windows across each contrast image frame to automatically select the first and last frames for generating accumulation images, using features like SNR, NI, and SNR×NI for consistent frame selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual frame selection is used for generating accumulation images, then the diagnostic value can be maintained through expert judgment, but the process is time-consuming and prone to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic valueVSAvoidframe selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic frame selection using computational algorithms that analyze image features independently, without requiring continuous human intervention. The processor automatically identifies optimal frames based on contrast enhancement metrics, allowing the system to serve itself in the frame selection task while maintaining diagnostic quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of frame selection by human operators is replaced with an automated computational system. The processor uses image feature analysis and statistical methods to substitute human judgment with algorithmic decision-making, eliminating time loss while preserving diagnostic reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual frame selection is used, then flexibility in selection can be maintained, but consistency is reduced due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection flexibilityVSAvoidframe selection consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains flexibility by allowing adjustment of image feature parameters and analysis thresholds. Different image features (e.g., contrast enhancement metrics, statistical distributions) can be weighted or selected based on specific diagnostic needs, while the automated processing ensures consistent application of chosen parameters across all frame selections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If grayscale intensities of individual pixels are used for frame selection, then the process is simple, but tissue signals are not suppressed completely leading to poor differentiation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection process complexityVSAvoidcontrast echo differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from analyzing single-pixel grayscale intensities to examining multi-pixel window statistical distributions. This dimensional expansion from point-based to region-based analysis provides richer information about tissue contrast and signal characteristics, enabling better differentiation of contrast echoes while maintaining manageable computational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Measurement precision

If image features from multi-pixel windows are used for automatic frame selection, then differentiation of contrast echoes improves, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrast echo differentiationVSAvoidimage processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts specific image features (such as contrast enhancement metrics and statistical distribution parameters) from multi-pixel windows, separating the essential diagnostic information from the full image data. This extraction approach maintains high measurement precision while reducing processing complexity by focusing computation on key extracted features rather than all pixel data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP4260276B1Apparatus and method for contrast imaging
Publication Date: 2026.03.25 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP4260276B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP4260276B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4260276B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Apparatuses, systems, and methods are provided for automatically selecting first and last frames for a sequence of frames from which an accumulation contrast image may be generated. In some examples, statistical distributions of groups of pixels of the image frames may be analyzed to generate parametric maps. The parametric maps may be analyzed to select the first and last image frames of the sequence. In some examples, an image frame corresponding to the parametric map having a value above a threshold value may be selected as a first frame. In some examples, an image frame corresponding to the parametric map having a maximum value of all the parametric maps may be selected as the last frame. In some examples, the parametric maps may be used to segment features, such as a tumor, from the image frame.