Contrastive Learning for Multi-Modal Driving Scenario Augmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tools and methodologies for simulating driving scenarios in autonomous or semi-autonomous vehicles are inadequate, as they fail to comprehensively capture the complexity of real-world driving scenarios, including various weather conditions, traffic conditions, and driving behaviors. Additionally, existing systems struggle to process and organize the vast amounts of navigation-related data generated by these vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A computing system that harnesses multi-modal sensor data and navigation-related data by fusing it a priori. This system uses encoder-decoder architectures, such as transformer-based systems, to create a unified multi-modal embedding space. It performs scenario annotation and mining, enabling enhanced training of semi-autonomous vehicle systems and rigorous validation and verification processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If rule-based paradigms are used for scenario analysis, then implementation is straightforward, but the system becomes unwieldy and cannot handle complex scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidcapability to handle complex scenarios
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces rule-based mechanical systems with neural network-based learning systems. The neural networks automatically learn driving scenarios and patterns from data, eliminating the need for manual rule creation while handling complex scenarios effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms discrete rule-based parameters into continuous learning parameters through neural networks. This allows the system to adapt to complex scenarios by adjusting learned parameters rather than following fixed rules, resolving the contradiction between implementation simplicity and complex scenario handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If focused models analyze single type of sensor data, then computational complexity is reduced, but cross-modal insights are missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoidcross-modal insights
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple focused models that analyze different sensor data types into a unified multi-modal embedding space. This combination preserves cross-modal insights while managing computational complexity through efficient architecture design and shared processing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal multi-modal embedding space that can process multiple sensor data types (visual, audio, sensor data) through a single framework. This universal approach prevents information loss while avoiding the complexity of separate dedicated systems for each modality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If heuristic blending methods combine data from multiple sensors, then data integration is achieved, but resolution to capture nuances is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integration capabilityVSAvoidresolution to capture nuances
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces heuristic blending methods with neural network-based processing. The neural networks automatically learn how to combine sensor data with appropriate weighting and resolution, capturing nuanced details that fixed heuristic rules cannot achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms multi-sensor data into a multi-dimensional embedding space where nuances are preserved through additional dimensional information. This dimensional transformation allows high-resolution capture of subtle场景 details while maintaining data integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Manufacturing precision

If manual annotation processes are used, then data labeling is achieved, but training processes are slowed down

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata labeling qualityVSAvoidtraining speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated annotation using neural networks. The models automatically label and annotate sensor data without human intervention, maintaining high labeling quality while dramatically increasing training speed and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated annotation before human review or direct training use. This preliminary action provides high-quality initial labels that accelerate the training process while maintaining precision through subsequent refinement if needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

5Productivity

If current systems process navigation data, then data handling is performed, but the intricate multi-modal embedding space creation is beyond their capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing capabilityVSAvoidmulti-modal embedding space creation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple processing capabilities into a unified system that creates multi-modal embedding spaces. By combining neural network processing with multi-sensor input handling, the system achieves both high productivity in data processing and the adaptability to create intricate embedding spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250156685A1Augmenting of driving scenarios using contrastive learning
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 PONY AI INC
  • US20250156685A1 patent drawing
  • US20250156685A1 patent drawing
  • US20250156685A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes one or more processors that obtain a textual prompt, encode the textual prompt, and obtain candidate sequences of sensor data from different modalities, each sequence including a plurality of sequential frames, each of the candidate sequences being evaluated against the textual prompt based on a contrastive loss. The system encodes the candidate sequences of sensor data, embedding position information, within the encoded candidate sequences, indicating relative timestamps associated with each of the sequential frames of the sensor data, concatenates the encoded candidate sequences of sensor data, including the embedded position information, transforms the concatenated and encoded frames of sensor data to form transformed candidate sequences, determines a particular candidate sequence as a match between the transformed candidate sequences and the encoded textual prompt based on the contrastive loss; and generates a hierarchical structure that encapsulates navigation data of the particular candidate sequence