Sheet-Metal Control Arm Eyelet Bridging for Suspension Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional sheet-metal control arms for vehicle wheel suspensions face challenges in maintaining shape stability and preventing eyelet slippage due to the lack of connection between neighboring eyelets, which complicates chassis bearing adjustment and increases the risk of deformation under stress.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of projections on the walls of the eyelets, which bridge the gap between them, providing a contact surface and preventing deformation by distributing pressure forces without increasing the degree of shaping or production complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If thin-walled components are used for the control arm, then lightweight construction is achieved, but load-bearing capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of control armVSAvoidload-bearing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The control arm is segmented into a thin-walled base body and separate reinforcement elements (protrusions and recesses) that are added only where needed. This allows the majority of the structure to remain lightweight while specific critical areas gain enhanced strength through the protrusion-recess interlocking mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of uniformly thickening the entire control arm, reinforcement is applied locally at the eyelet regions where stresses are concentrated. The protrusions and recesses are positioned precisely at the eyelet openings to provide targeted strengthening without adding unnecessary weight to other parts of the structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If eyelets are arranged at a distance to one another, then chassis bearing adjustment is facilitated, but shape stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechassis bearing adjustmentVSAvoidshape stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The protrusion from one eyelet and the recess at the other eyelet are designed to interlock, merging the two separated eyelet structures into a unified stable assembly. This connection maintains shape stability while allowing the eyelets to remain spaced apart for bearing adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Stability of the object's composition

If the degree of shaping is increased to prevent eyelet deformation, then shape stability is improved, but production complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeyelet shape stabilityVSAvoidproduction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protrusions and recesses are pre-formed as integral features of the eyelet structure during the stamping process, before the deep-drawing shaping operation. This preliminary formation of reinforcement elements prevents the need for excessive shaping degrees during subsequent manufacturing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8925945B2Sheet-metal control arm for a wheel suspension of a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2015.01.06 AUDI AG
  • US8925945B2 patent drawing
  • US8925945B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sheet-metal control arm for a wheel suspension of a motor vehicle includes a base body, and two eyelets arranged in spaced-apart relationship at least at one end of the base body. Each eyelet has an opening, with the openings of the eyelets receiving a chassis bearing. At least one of the eyelets has a wall which is provided with a projection which is configured to at least partly bridge a gap to a wall of the other one of the eyelets.