Control-Aware Trajectory Prediction for Pedestrian-Critical Driving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicle prediction models are ineffective in complex traffic environments due to equal weighting of all agents, leading to catastrophic errors in detecting vehicles and pedestrians, which can result in collisions, while errors from non-interacting agents are inconsequential, highlighting the need for control-aware prediction objectives that prioritize error propagation impacts on downstream decisions.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of control-aware prediction objectives (CAPOs) that use importance-weighted prediction likelihood objectives and attention weights to train models, focusing on the relative effects of predictive errors on downstream control, identifying and weighting errors that maximally influence decision-making, such as the GRU encoder-decoder architecture for trajectory prediction with attention mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all agents are weighted equally in prediction models, then the model treats all agents uniformly, but catastrophic errors occur in detecting vehicles and pedestrians leading to collisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of autonomous vehicleVSAvoidprediction accuracy of critical agents
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different weights to different agents based on their importance to safety. The loss function modifies the standard prediction loss by multiplying it with an importance weight for each agent, where critical agents (vehicles and pedestrians) have higher weights and less critical agents have lower weights. This ensures that prediction errors for safety-critical agents have a greater impact on the training process, improving prediction accuracy where it matters most for collision avoidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the model focuses on safety-critical predictions, then collision risks are reduced, but model capacity must be allocated selectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance capabilityVSAvoidmodel training complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter weighting in the loss function to reflect safety criticality. By introducing an importance weight parameter for each agent that modifies the loss calculation, the model learns to prioritize safety-critical predictions during training. This parameter change transforms the uniform treatment of all agents into a differentiated approach where prediction accuracy is optimized for agents that matter most for collision avoidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If all prediction errors are treated equally during training, then the training process is simple, but errors from non-interacting agents are inconsequential while errors from interacting agents are catastrophic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction error impact assessmentVSAvoidtraining process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using the importance weights to modulate the gradient updates during training. The loss function incorporates agent-specific importance weights that provide feedback to the model about which prediction errors are most consequential. This feedback mechanism guides the optimization process to focus computational resources on reducing errors for safety-critical agents, creating a training dynamic that prioritizes collision avoidance over uniform accuracy across all agents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12103564B2Planning-aware prediction for control-aware autonomous driving modules
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12103564B2 patent drawing
  • US12103564B2 patent drawing
  • US12103564B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of generating an output trajectory of an ego vehicle includes recording trajectory data of the ego vehicle and pedestrian agents from a scene of a training environment of the ego vehicle. The method includes identifying at least one pedestrian agent from the pedestrian agents within the scene of the training environment of the ego vehicle causing a prediction-discrepancy by the ego vehicle greater than the pedestrian agents within the scene. The method includes updating parameters of a motion prediction model of the ego vehicle based on a magnitude of the prediction-discrepancy caused by the at least one pedestrian agent on the ego vehicle to form a trained, control-aware prediction objective model. The method includes selecting a vehicle control action of the ego vehicle in response to a predicted motion from the trained, control-aware prediction objective model regarding detected pedestrian agents within a traffic environment of the ego vehicle.