Control Channel Repetition Across Multiple TRPs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing control and data channels, particularly in scenarios with varying traffic loads and device capabilities, which can lead to suboptimal performance and increased latency.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves implementing advanced control channel repetition mechanisms across multiple Transmission Points (TRPs) and configuring flexible bandwidth parts (BWPs) to adapt to changing network conditions and device capabilities, thereby optimizing channel utilization and reducing latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If control channel repetition is implemented across multiple TRPs, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol channel reception reliabilityVSAvoidUE processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control channel transmission is segmented across multiple TRPs, where each TRP transmits a portion of the control channel repetition. This segmentation improves reliability through diversity while the UE processes each segment independently according to configured rules, managing complexity through structured handling of divided transmissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically configures control channel repetition parameters including number of repetitions, TRP associations, and bandwidth part configurations based on channel conditions and traffic requirements. This dynamic adaptation optimizes reliability while adjusting processing complexity to actual needs rather than maintaining fixed high complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If flexible bandwidth parts are configured, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork condition adaptationVSAvoidBWP configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes bandwidth part parameters dynamically based on channel conditions, traffic load, and device capabilities. BWP configurations including bandwidth, subcarrier spacing, and cyclic prefix lengths are adjusted through parameter changes to optimize performance for different scenarios while the UE follows configured rules to manage complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The bandwidth part configuration mechanism serves multiple functions including adapting to different traffic types, supporting various device capabilities, and optimizing for different channel conditions. This multi-functionality achieves high adaptability while the UE handles diverse configurations through unified processing rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If control channel repetition is implemented, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol channel decoding reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol channel transmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Control channel repetitions are transmitted periodically across multiple TRPs and time instances, allowing the UE to accumulate reliable decoding information over repeated transmissions. The periodic structure enables reliability improvement through multiple opportunities while the regular pattern helps the UE manage processing timing efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary configuration of control channel repetition parameters, TRP associations, and bandwidth part settings before actual transmission. This preliminary setup enables the UE to prepare processing rules in advance, reducing actual transmission and processing time while maintaining reliability through pre-planned repetition structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250071854A1Predefined Rules in Control Channel Repetition
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 BLOOMSBURY DESIGN LABS LLC
  • US20250071854A1 patent drawing
  • US20250071854A1 patent drawing
  • US20250071854A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless device receives one or more radio resource control (RRC) messages. The RRC messages comprise one or more control resource set (coreset) identifiers (IDs) for one or more coresets in a downlink bandwidth part (BWP) of a cell. The wireless device receives a medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) indicating activation of an ordered set of two transmission configuration indicator (TCI) states for a coreset of the one or more coresets. The coreset is with a lowest coreset ID among the one or more coreset IDs of the one or more coresets. In response to the coreset with the lowest coreset ID being activated with the two TCI states, the wireless device transmits an uplink signal with a spatial domain transmission filter determined based on a first TCI state occurring first in the ordered set of the two TCI states of the coreset.