Control Circuit Arrangement Verification for Semiconductor Floor Plans

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for verifying the arrangement of control circuits in semiconductor devices require generating a net list and manually inserting control circuits, leading to lengthy failure/no-failure tests and limiting the ability to test multiple circuit arrangements due to time constraints.

Innovation Solution

An arrangement verification apparatus that includes a floor plan generation unit, a grouping generation unit to create a group tree, and a control circuit arrangement unit to arrange control circuits based on circuit specifications, allowing for a failure/no-failure test without the need for a net list, thereby reducing testing time and enabling the examination of multiple arrangements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional net list generation and manual control circuit insertion methods are used, then the arrangement verification can be performed, but the testing time becomes excessively long (several days to several weeks)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearrangement verification accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the unnecessary net list generation step from the conventional verification process. By directly inputting circuit specifications without requiring net list conversion, the method removes a time-consuming intermediate processing stage while maintaining verification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary arrangement verification by automatically arranging control circuits based on circuit specifications before final design completion. This allows verification to occur earlier in the design process, significantly reducing the overall testing time while ensuring arrangement correctness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple types of circuitry arrangements are to be tested in the development phase, then design quality can be enhanced, but the time pressure from lengthy testing prevents attempting multiple arrangements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to test multiple arrangementsVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention enables dynamic testing of multiple circuit arrangements by allowing rapid re-arrangement and re-verification of control circuits. The automated arrangement system can quickly generate different configuration options based on the same circuit specifications, enabling designers to evaluate multiple arrangements within the development phase time constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the verification approach from manual net list-based processing to automated specification-based processing. This parameter change in the verification method dramatically reduces testing time, enabling the evaluation of multiple circuit arrangements during the development phase rather than being limited to a single arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If manual control circuit insertion and net list generation are used, then the verification process follows conventional standards, but design rework increases and multiple arrangements cannot be efficiently examined

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearrangement verification accuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the manual mechanical process of net list generation and control circuit insertion with an automated computational system. The arrangement verification apparatus automatically processes circuit specifications and arranges control circuits without manual intervention, reducing process complexity while maintaining verification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8122416B2Arrangement verification apparatus
Publication Date: 2012.02.21 RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORP
  • US8122416B2 patent drawing
  • US8122416B2 patent drawing
  • US8122416B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An arrangement verification apparatus that makes it possible to shorten a time it takes to complete a failure/no-failure test on the arrangement of control circuits that control block circuits is provided. The arrangement verification apparatus arranges block circuits to be controlled comprising a semiconductor device and control circuits that control the block circuits over a predetermined floor and conducts a failure/no-failure test on the arrangement of the control circuits. The arrangement verification apparatus includes: a floor plan generation unit that arranges block circuits over a floor based on circuit specifications; a grouping generation unit that hierarchically groups the block circuits arranged over the floor and control circuits described in the circuit specifications based on a predetermined requirement to generate a group tree; a control circuit arrangement unit that arranges the control circuits over the floor according to a predetermined condition and the group tree generated at the grouping generation unit; and a failure/no-failure test unit that conducts a failure/no-failure test on the arrangement of the control circuits by the control circuit arrangement unit.