Industrial Control Configuration Using Deep Learning Under Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing industrial control systems struggle to improve product quality beyond historical best without violating constraints, especially under changing environments with noisy data, relying on random experiments or domain experts for process parameter definition.

Innovation Solution

A deep learning-based method using a multilayer perceptron model to learn relationships among operating parameters, quality indicators, and constraints, employing gradient descent and soft ball optimization to predict optimal controllable parameter values, ensuring gradual improvements and adherence to constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If existing techniques like Bayesian optimization or gradient-based methods are used, then initial settings or historical data can be utilized, but they cannot consistently improve product quality beyond historical best under changing environments with noisy data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct qualityVSAvoidconsistency of quality improvement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the optimization process into distinct phases: data preprocessing phase, MLP model training phase, and gradient descent optimization phase. This segmentation allows each phase to handle specific challenges (noise filtering, relationship learning, precise optimization) independently, improving overall reliability of quality improvement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an MLP model as an intermediary between historical data and optimization. The MLP learns the underlying relationships in noisy data and provides a smoothed, reliable objective function for gradient descent, enabling consistent quality improvement beyond historical best

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If random experiments or domain expert methods are used to define process parameters, then initial configurations can be obtained, but the system cannot adapt to changing operating conditions and raw material quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to changing conditionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically learning relationships from historical data through the MLP model and autonomously optimizing parameters using gradient descent. This eliminates the need for domain experts to manually define parameters while adapting to changing conditions, achieving high adaptability without proportionally increasing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes optimization parameters (learning rate, batch size, regularization strength) during the gradient descent process based on performance feedback. This allows the system to adapt to changing operating conditions automatically, maintaining versatility while managing complexity through automated parameter tuning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If gradient-based techniques are used to improve product quality beyond historical data, then optimization can be performed, but they do not perform efficiently when data is noisy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct quality improvementVSAvoiddata quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary data preprocessing and MLP model training before applying gradient descent optimization. This preliminary action filters out noise and learns robust relationships from historical data, enabling gradient-based techniques to work efficiently even when raw data is noisy, thereby improving both quality and measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through the MLP model that continuously monitors the relationship between operating parameters and quality metrics. This feedback mechanism allows the gradient descent to adjust its path based on learned patterns from noisy data, maintaining efficient optimization while being robust to measurement imprecision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4600773A1Recommending optimum configurations in industrial control systems for improving quality of product
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • EP4600773A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4600773A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4600773A1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

The embodiments of present disclosure herein address unresolved problem of getting optimum quality of product while changing operating conditions and raw material frequently in an industrial manufacturing process. The disclosure herein generally relates to a deep learning based approach for a multi-objective constrained optimization. Embodiments provide a method and system for recommending optimum configurations in industrial control systems for improving quality of product. The system is configured to automate improvement over existing golden batch with a data driven approach and replace need of random experimentation with very minimal systematic experiments. The system ensures that no constraint violations are made, and the system remains stable even when data is noisy. Further, the system recommends values of parameters so that improvement in quality is achieved. The changes in parameter value should be gradual even if the historical data received from feedback is noisy.