Wall-Mounted Control Device Command Processing Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wall-mounted control units lack the capability to efficiently process processor-intensive commands, often requiring separate controllers or large computers to handle complex operations, which can be inefficient and unnecessary.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a method and apparatus that determine whether a received command can be locally processed by a control device, with the option to forward processor-intensive commands to a server for processing, and then send the processed audio stream to a termination device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If a control device processes all commands locally, then processing speed is fast, but processing capacity is insufficient for processor-intensive commands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidcontroller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments processing tasks by categorizing commands into two types: simple commands processed locally by the control device and processor-intensive commands processed remotely by a server. This segmentation allows the control device to maintain simplicity while the system as a whole gains enhanced processing capacity through the server for complex operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Power

If multiple controllers or large computers are used to handle complex operations, then processing capacity increases, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device incorporates a command analysis function that universally handles all incoming commands, determining whether they require local or remote processing. This multi-functional approach allows a single controller to manage both simple and complex commands by dynamically routing them to appropriate processing resources, eliminating the need for multiple specialized controllers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If processor-intensive commands are handled locally, then response time is fast, but resource usage becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control device acts as an intermediary that analyzes commands and routes them to appropriate processing resources. For processor-intensive commands, it mediates by forwarding to a server, optimizing resource utilization. For simple commands, it processes locally, maintaining fast response times. This intermediary role ensures efficient resource distribution without significant processing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12267656B2Managing processor intensive commands by a controller
Publication Date: 2025.04.01 BIAMP SYST LLC
  • US12267656B2 patent drawing
  • US12267656B2 patent drawing
  • US12267656B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One example method of operation may include determining whether a received command will be locally processed by a control device, determining an audio stream is associated with the received command, forwarding the audio stream to a server, and forwarding an audio output to a termination device based on a processed audio stream.