Control Display Prompts for Fewer Key Presses and Lower Power

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for displaying controls on electronic devices are cumbersome and inefficient, often requiring multiple key presses and wasting user time and device energy, particularly in battery-operated devices.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that detects user inputs and displays prompts or indications based on predefined criteria, reducing the need for confirmatory actions and optimizing the display process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a complex user interface with multiple key presses is used to display controls, then the control display can be comprehensive and accurate, but the user time and device energy consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol display accuracyVSAvoiduser time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically detecting user inputs and pre-determining whether to display a prompt based on predefined criteria before the user completes their input sequence. This allows the system to prepare the appropriate display response in advance, reducing the time the user needs to spend on confirmatory actions while maintaining accurate control display.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by detecting user inputs and providing immediate visual feedback through prompts or indications on the display. This feedback mechanism allows users to confirm their actions without requiring multiple sequential key presses, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining display accuracy through the feedback loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If a complex user interface with multiple key presses is used to display controls, then the control display can be comprehensive and accurate, but the device energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol display accuracyVSAvoiddevice energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically detecting user inputs and pre-determining whether to display a prompt based on predefined criteria before the user completes their input sequence. This allows the system to prepare the appropriate display response in advance, reducing the time the user needs to spend on confirmatory actions while maintaining accurate control display.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by detecting user inputs and providing immediate visual feedback through prompts or indications on the display. This feedback mechanism allows users to confirm their actions without requiring multiple sequential key presses, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining display accuracy through the feedback loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If prompts are displayed for every user input, then user confirmation can be ensured, but the cognitive burden on the user increases and the interface becomes less efficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser action confirmationVSAvoiduser cognitive burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by selectively displaying prompts only when specific predefined criteria are met, rather than uniformly displaying prompts for all user inputs. This selective approach ensures reliable confirmation for critical actions while avoiding unnecessary prompts for routine operations, thereby reducing cognitive burden and improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial action by providing confirmation prompts only for a subset of user inputs that meet specific criteria, rather than for all inputs. This partial approach maintains reliability for important actions while avoiding excessive confirmation requests that would increase cognitive burden and reduce interface efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Measurement precision

If multiple key presses are required to perform actions, then the control precision can be maintained, but the productivity of the user decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoiduser productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically detecting user inputs and pre-determining whether to display a prompt based on predefined criteria before the user completes their input sequence. This allows the system to prepare the appropriate display response in advance, reducing the time the user needs to spend on confirmatory actions while maintaining accurate control display.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by detecting user inputs and providing immediate visual feedback through prompts or indications on the display. This feedback mechanism allows users to confirm their actions without requiring multiple sequential key presses, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining display accuracy through the feedback loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250377781A1Techniques for displaying controls
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 APPLE INC
  • US20250377781A1 patent drawing
  • US20250377781A1 patent drawing
  • US20250377781A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure generally relates to displaying controls. Some techniques are for displaying controls in accordance with some embodiments.