Control Effector Health Reasoning for Fault Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle health management systems face challenges in accurately determining the lost and remaining functional capabilities of control effectors under severe environmental conditions, often resulting in inadequate precision and undue complexity, especially in vehicles with power, weight, and size constraints.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that processes command and sensor data to generate health data for control effectors, using a reasoner to selectively indict and clear faults, determine failures, and determine the usable range of control effector commands, incorporating a test module and reasoner to handle diagnostic complexities like ambiguity and false alarms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional health monitoring systems are used in vehicles with power, weight, and size constraints, then the system complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision and fault isolation capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidfault isolation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a reasoner as an intermediary component that processes health data and generates capability assessments. The reasoner acts as a mediator between the simple onboard sensors and the complex fault analysis requirements, enabling precise fault isolation without adding complex hardware. The reasoner synthesizes information from multiple sources and applies diagnostic logic to determine control effector capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical fault isolation systems with an information-processing approach. Instead of using additional physical sensors and mechanical diagnostic equipment, the system uses a reasoner that processes existing health data through logical inference and analysis algorithms to achieve precise fault identification and capability determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive health monitoring is implemented to accurately determine control effector capabilities, then the measurement precision improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehealth determination accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reasoner serves multiple functions within a single component: it processes health data, identifies faults, determines control effector capabilities, and provides recommendations. This multi-functional approach achieves comprehensive health monitoring accuracy without requiring separate complex systems for each function, thereby limiting the increase in overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If fault isolation is attempted to determine control effector health, then the measurement precision improves, but the loss of time increases due to diagnostic complexities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault identification accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by continuously processing health data through the reasoner, which maintains an updated understanding of control effector capabilities. This preliminary action allows the system to have fault isolation and capability determination already prepared or quickly determined when needed, reducing the time loss during critical diagnostic situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If adaptive reconfiguration is implemented to maintain functionality under degraded conditions, then the adaptability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reconfiguration capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptability where the control system can reconfigure itself based on real-time health assessments from the reasoner. The system transitions from static control architecture to a dynamic one that automatically adjusts control effector usage, command distribution, and system configuration based on current capabilities, enabling adaptability through software-controlled dynamics rather than complex hardware reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9046891B2Control effector health capabilities determination reasoning system and method
Publication Date: 2015.06.02 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US9046891B2 patent drawing
  • US9046891B2 patent drawing
  • US9046891B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for determining the response capabilities of a control effector are provided. Command data and sensor data associated with the control effector are processed to generate control effector health data representative of control effector health. The control effector health data are processed in a reasoned. The reasoned is configure to selectively indict and clear one or more faults, determine one or more failures that cause indicted faults, and determine, based on the one or more determined failures, a usable range of control effector commands to which the control effector can respond.