Control Feedback Signaling for UE State Switch Decoding Clarity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ambiguity exists in wireless communications systems regarding whether user equipment (UE) has successfully decoded control messages and performed operations, leading to unclear feedback and potential inefficiencies in power consumption and communication reliability.

Innovation Solution

UEs and network entities implement enhanced control format feedback mechanisms to clarify decoding and operation success through explicit feedback indicating whether control messages are successfully decoded, received, and operations performed, allowing for improved coordination and reduced power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional control message feedback is used, then device complexity is reduced, but feedback reliability and decoding success clarity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback reliabilityVSAvoidfeedback mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback message is segmented into multiple independent feedback information elements, each corresponding to a specific control message parameter (e.g., first feedback information for first parameter, second feedback information for second parameter). This segmentation allows each feedback element to be independently generated and transmitted, improving reliability without requiring a completely new feedback mechanism design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements an explicit feedback mechanism where the UE generates feedback information elements that directly indicate decoding success or failure for each control message parameter. This feedback loop allows the network to understand exactly which parameters were successfully decoded and which were not, improving reliability by eliminating ambiguity in the feedback state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If enhanced feedback with multiple feedback information elements is implemented, then communication reliability is improved, but feedback message size and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidfeedback processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback message is divided into discrete feedback information elements, each associated with a specific control message parameter. This segmentation makes the feedback structure predictable and manageable, allowing the UE and network to process only the relevant feedback elements without needing to parse through complex nested structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each feedback information element has specific local characteristics (e.g., associated with a particular parameter, indicating success or failure for that parameter). This local quality allows the system to optimize processing for each element independently, reducing overall complexity by avoiding a monolithic feedback processing approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Use of energy by moving object

If UE performs operations based on ambiguous feedback, then device complexity is reduced, but power consumption increases due to unnecessary operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidfeedback interpretation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The explicit feedback mechanism provides clear, unambiguous information about decoding success for each control message parameter. This eliminates the need for the UE to perform operations based on ambiguous feedback states, reducing power consumption by preventing unnecessary operations while maintaining simple feedback interpretation logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of having the UE make assumptions about feedback states and perform operations accordingly (which leads to ambiguity and wasted power), the system inverts the approach by having the feedback explicitly state the actual decoding success status. This inversion eliminates ambiguity and allows the UE to perform operations only when necessary, reducing power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS20250380275A1Enhanced control format feedback
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20250380275A1 patent drawing
  • US20250380275A1 patent drawing
  • US20250380275A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. A user equipment (UE) may monitor for a control message including scheduling information for a downlink message for the UE and command information instructing the UE to perform an operation. The operation may be to switch from a first mode or state (e.g., related to a bandwidth part (BWP), a secondary cell (SCell) dormancy state, a transmission configuration indication (TCI) state, a search space set group (SSSG), a minimum scheduling offset, or a combination thereof) to a second mode or state. The UE may generate feedback associated with the control message based on the monitoring. The feedback may indicate whether the UE successfully decoded the control message, whether the UE successfully received the downlink message, and whether the UE successfully performed the operation. The UE may transmit a feedback message including the generated feedback in accordance with a feedback configuration.