Control Knob Locking Element to Prevent Accidental Appliance Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cooktop control knobs are easily accessible, posing a safety risk for accidental operation by children and individuals with dementia or Alzheimer's, as they can activate appliance functions unintentionally.

Innovation Solution

A safety control lockout knob design featuring a locking element that secures the knob in a rotational position, requiring user manipulation to disengage and rotate, incorporating a pin, leg, or lever mechanism with a spring bias to lock and unlock the knob, preventing accidental actuation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If control knobs are placed at an easily accessible location for user operation, then ease of operation is improved, but safety deteriorates due to accidental operation by children or individuals with dementia

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility of control knobsVSAvoidaccidental operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control knob is divided into two functional parts: a rotatable body for setting controls and a separate locking element (such as a pin, leg, or lever) that must be disengaged before rotation can occur. This segmentation prevents accidental operation while maintaining ease of use, as the locking element can be easily manipulated by adults but creates a barrier for children or individuals with cognitive impairments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A locking element acts as an intermediary mechanism between the user and the rotatable body. This intermediary component (pin, leg, or lever) must be moved to a disengaged position before the knob can be rotated, thereby preventing direct and accidental activation of appliance functions while still allowing intentional operation when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a locking element is added to prevent accidental operation, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccidental operation preventionVSAvoidcontrol knob structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking element is designed to be self-latching through spring biasing or resilient deflection, automatically returning to its engaged position after being moved. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for additional motors, sensors, or complex control systems, maintaining simplicity while providing effective safety functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism replaces complex electronic safety systems with a simple mechanical solution. The locking element (pin, leg, or lever) uses basic mechanical principles such as spring biasing and resilient deflection to provide safety interlocking, avoiding the need for electronic sensors, motors, or control circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a locking element requiring manipulation is implemented, then safety is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccidental operation preventionVSAvoidoperation convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking element is designed with differentiated local qualities: it requires a specific manipulation action (pushing, pulling, or rotating) that is easy for adults to perform but creates a sufficient barrier for children or individuals with cognitive impairments. The local design of the locking interface provides intuitive feedback while maintaining operational simplicity for intended users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively prevents accidental operation by requiring user intervention to unlock the knob, enhancing safety by ensuring intentional control over appliance functions.

Implementation Method 1

A spring biases the locking element into a first position wherein a distal end of the pin portion extends to a forward position relative to a front end of the knob body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

The at least one leg is resiliently deflectable into a second position wherein the distal end is deflected toward said longitudinal axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10437278B2Safety control lockout knob
Publication Date: 2019.10.08 ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS INC
  • US10437278B2 patent drawing
  • US10437278B2 patent drawing
  • US10437278B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control knob for controlling the operation of a component of a household appliance is disclosed. The control knob includes a body configured to be attached to a rotatable rod extending from the appliance. A locking element reversibly secures the body in at least one rotational position. The locking element is movable between a first position and a second position. The locking element is configured to engage with a notch to rotatably secure the body in the at least one rotational position when the locking element is in the first position, and to disengage from the notch to permit the body to be rotated when the locking element is in the second position.